Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switch to lodash #189

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 15, 2016
Merged

Switch to lodash #189

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 15, 2016

Conversation

existentialism
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@lelandrichardson
Copy link
Collaborator

@ljharb any issues you can think of with the changes of object.values and object.assign?

@ljharb
Copy link
Member

ljharb commented Feb 15, 2016

Yes, we shouldn't be using lodash when we don't have to be. @existentialism please only convert existing underscore uses to lodash.

@existentialism
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ljharb @lelandrichardson reverted those changes!

@lelandrichardson
Copy link
Collaborator

Cool. LGTM!

lelandrichardson added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 15, 2016
@lelandrichardson lelandrichardson merged commit dd655c4 into enzymejs:master Feb 15, 2016
@existentialism existentialism deleted the lodash branch February 15, 2016 23:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants