From faf27add278caaffcbd5627b177d208323a659af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gaurav Munjal Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 16:24:24 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] An Ember Community Experience --- .../2019-02-22-the-ember-times-issue-86.md | 19 ++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/source/blog/2019-02-22-the-ember-times-issue-86.md b/source/blog/2019-02-22-the-ember-times-issue-86.md index affc1b65cb..a9579dc442 100644 --- a/source/blog/2019-02-22-the-ember-times-issue-86.md +++ b/source/blog/2019-02-22-the-ember-times-issue-86.md @@ -56,7 +56,24 @@ Read and comment on the [Decorator Support RFC](https://github.com/emberjs/rfcs/ --- -## [SECTION TITLE](#section-url) +## An Ember Community Experience by Gaurav Munjal + +I had wanted to make some large breaking changes to +[ember-simple-tree](https://github.com/btecu/ember-simple-tree) +in order to enable me to customize it to my liking. +Given that it would break backward +compatibility and existing applications, +I figured my changes would never be accepted. +So I forked it and released my version as ember-light-tree. + +I was surprised when Bujorel Tecu, the author of ember-simple-tree, +contacted me and wanted to work together to include my changes. +As a result, my changes are now in the latest version of +ember-simple-tree. +It seems it was more important to him that we had a shared solution +than that there was technical backward compatibility. It seems this +view is shared by the Ember Community and helps keep it from +fragmenting around different addons. --- From df4e00daa9741d8b4fedf75c27f0df3f83c055ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Amy Lam Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 21:04:18 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Update 2019-02-22-the-ember-times-issue-86.md --- .../2019-02-22-the-ember-times-issue-86.md | 29 +++++++------------ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/source/blog/2019-02-22-the-ember-times-issue-86.md b/source/blog/2019-02-22-the-ember-times-issue-86.md index a9579dc442..67fc627e2b 100644 --- a/source/blog/2019-02-22-the-ember-times-issue-86.md +++ b/source/blog/2019-02-22-the-ember-times-issue-86.md @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ --- title: The Ember Times - Issue No. XX -author: Chris Ng, the crowd +author: Chris Ng, Gaurav Munjal, Amy Lam, the crowd tags: Recent Posts, Newsletter, Ember.js Times, Ember Times, 2019 alias : "blog/2019/xx/xx-the-ember-times-issue-XX.html" responsive: true @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ responsive: true -Check out the two follow up RFCs to make Tracked Properties better 👣 +Check out the two follow up RFCs to make Tracked Properties better 👣, an Ember community experience 🤝... --- @@ -56,25 +56,16 @@ Read and comment on the [Decorator Support RFC](https://github.com/emberjs/rfcs/ --- -## An Ember Community Experience by Gaurav Munjal +## An Ember Community Experience by Gaurav Munjal 💛 -I had wanted to make some large breaking changes to -[ember-simple-tree](https://github.com/btecu/ember-simple-tree) -in order to enable me to customize it to my liking. -Given that it would break backward -compatibility and existing applications, -I figured my changes would never be accepted. -So I forked it and released my version as ember-light-tree. +I had wanted to make some large breaking changes to [ember-simple-tree](https://github.com/btecu/ember-simple-tree), +in order to enable me to customize it to my liking. Given that it would break backward compatibility and existing applications, I figured my changes would never be accepted. So I forked it and released my version as ember-light-tree. -I was surprised when Bujorel Tecu, the author of ember-simple-tree, -contacted me and wanted to work together to include my changes. -As a result, my changes are now in the latest version of -ember-simple-tree. -It seems it was more important to him that we had a shared solution -than that there was technical backward compatibility. It seems this -view is shared by the Ember Community and helps keep it from -fragmenting around different addons. +I was surprised when Bujorel Tecu AKA [@btecu](https://github.com/btecu), the author of ember-simple-tree, +contacted me and wanted to work together to include my changes. As a result, my changes are now in the latest version of +ember-simple-tree. +Even though we had to sacrifice technical backward compatibility, it was important to @btecu that we had a shared solution. One of the main strengths of Ember is how shared conventions enable developers to build on top of each other's work and improve the ecosystem for everyone. It's heartening to see this view echoed in the Ember addon community. --- @@ -125,4 +116,4 @@ That's another wrap! ✨ Be kind, -Chris Ng, the crowd and the Learning Team +Chris Ng, Gaurav Munjal, Amy Lam the crowd and the Learning Team From 70bcab076c074981a5d4e999b04289008768ef14 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Amy Lam Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 21:08:14 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] Update 2019-02-22-the-ember-times-issue-86.md --- source/blog/2019-02-22-the-ember-times-issue-86.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/source/blog/2019-02-22-the-ember-times-issue-86.md b/source/blog/2019-02-22-the-ember-times-issue-86.md index 67fc627e2b..0fe2a05b7f 100644 --- a/source/blog/2019-02-22-the-ember-times-issue-86.md +++ b/source/blog/2019-02-22-the-ember-times-issue-86.md @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ Read and comment on the [Decorator Support RFC](https://github.com/emberjs/rfcs/ --- -## An Ember Community Experience by Gaurav Munjal 💛 +## [An Ember Community Experience by Gaurav Munjal 💛](https://twitter.com/gaurav9576/status/1098298137507217408) I had wanted to make some large breaking changes to [ember-simple-tree](https://github.com/btecu/ember-simple-tree), in order to enable me to customize it to my liking. Given that it would break backward compatibility and existing applications, I figured my changes would never be accepted. So I forked it and released my version as ember-light-tree.