You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This would allow the dll to pass the Microsoft Platform Ready test without the software under test requiring a waiver. Current error message is 'Elmah.dll does not have a valid "Company name" property'
Originally reported on Google Code with ID 371
Reported by TrimMabl on 2014-09-18 12:29:28
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I would say that the general consensus is that it is indeed a strange requirement. See for instance this similiar issue for the fluent validation library.
But I use other third party open source libraries that specify company name and while not legally true you could interpret "company name" as "responsible organization". I would guess that the test requirement stems from the need to separate the code that is under test, the binaries with our company name, from the third party binaries. As I said you don't fail the test based on this missing info but you need to do additional work attaching a disclaimer that this and that dll is third party.
Add a company name to the assemblyinfo.
This would allow the dll to pass the Microsoft Platform Ready test without the software under test requiring a waiver. Current error message is 'Elmah.dll does not have a valid "Company name" property'
Originally reported on Google Code with ID 371
Reported by
TrimMabl
on 2014-09-18 12:29:28The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: