Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add company name to assemblyinfo #371

Open
atifaziz opened this issue Aug 25, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

Add company name to assemblyinfo #371

atifaziz opened this issue Aug 25, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@atifaziz
Copy link
Member

Add a company name to the assemblyinfo.

This would allow the dll to pass the Microsoft Platform Ready test without the software under test requiring a waiver. Current error message is 'Elmah.dll does not have a valid "Company name" property'


Originally reported on Google Code with ID 371

Reported by TrimMabl on 2014-09-18 12:29:28

@atifaziz
Copy link
Member Author

Hi there,

The problem here is that there is no company.
This is Open Source Software, created by private individuals!

It seems very strange to have a missing company name failing such a test.

Cheers,
James


Reported by @JamesDriscoll on 2014-09-18 12:43:13

  • Status changed: NeedsInfo

@atifaziz
Copy link
Member Author

I would say that the general consensus is that it is indeed a strange requirement. See for instance this similiar issue for the fluent validation library.

http://fluentvalidation.codeplex.com/workitem/7184

But I use other third party open source libraries that specify company name and while not legally true you could interpret "company name" as "responsible organization". I would guess that the test requirement stems from the need to separate the code that is under test, the binaries with our company name, from the third party binaries. As I said you don't fail the test based on this missing info but you need to do additional work attaching a disclaimer that this and that dll is third party.


Reported by TrimMabl on 2014-09-23 09:47:27

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant