Rust crate #57
Rust crate #57
Conversation
|
Were you able to test this? |
|
Testing wise, cargo build definitely works. I can actually add a unit test. What I haven't tested is the cargo publishing stuff but I obviously cannot test that yet very easily. |
|
This also means, that I need to get to #52 (or hope somebody else can help) |
|
Sorry this has been so messy. I guess working on CI config often leads to messy pull requests but I think we are getting there now. |
|
Dry run publishing looks good to me https://github.com/Razzeee/tree-sitter-elm/runs/1432779911?check_suite_focus=true |
|
Don't worry, I don't think that this is messy
…On Fri, Nov 20, 2020, 19:51 Harry Sarson ***@***.***> wrote:
Dry run publishing looks good to me
https://github.com/Razzeee/tree-sitter-elm/runs/1432779911?check_suite_focus=true
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#57 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABNLEZAPEV46L2MILWVKWK3SQ23DTANCNFSM4TY4Y2XA>
.
|
|
Next step is to remove the dry run flag but still run publish on pull requests and see if 4.3.1 gets released I think. |
|
Maybe I should add some docs first |
|
I'll merge this and try to release a new version with the only change, that we get a rust version out of this. |
A possible implementation of #54. Includes a sketch of what automated releases might look like.