Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Discrepancy in README.md and LICENSE re license used #51

Closed
julien-pcd opened this issue Feb 25, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #52
Closed

Discrepancy in README.md and LICENSE re license used #51

julien-pcd opened this issue Feb 25, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #52

Comments

@julien-pcd
Copy link

The README.md mentions the source code is released under the terms of BSD-3, but your LICENSE file is MIT. Can you specify which is the correct license?

@prikhi
Copy link
Member

prikhi commented Feb 25, 2020

I'd say MIT since the license file was added with the initial commit(52fd349) while the readme text was added later(d669ca3).

prikhi added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 25, 2020
Change the package's License specified in the README to MIT, since this
is what the original commit for the repository stated, as well as the
elm.json & LICENSE file.

Closes #51
skyqrose added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 26, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants