You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current categories in the packages are logs, metrics. But instead these should be more like database, cache etc.
The values for the dataset type which is logs, metrics and should not have to be set by the users as it should be possible to extract these from the datasets.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If needed for querying, these types could also be exposed as a summary of all datasets on the package level
For the categories, I'm starting to think the category should be defined per dataset and not on the package level. And what we present on the package level for categories, is a summary of the categories in each dataset. I assume in most cases. all dataset of a single package will have the same category but it is not a requirement. @mostlyjason WDYT?
Following the above, we would have category: foo in each dataset. The nice part about this is that it also makes sure each dataset has only one category. These should then be validated against the valid categories.
Cloud
Config management
Containers
AWS
Azure
Cointainer
CRM
Custom
Datastore
Elastic Stack
Google Cloud
Kubernetes
Languages
Message Queue
Monitoring
Network
Notification
Orchestration
OS & System
Productivity
Security
Support
Ticketing
Version Control
Web
The current categories in the packages are
logs
,metrics
. But instead these should be more likedatabase
,cache
etc.The values for the dataset type which is
logs
,metrics
and should not have to be set by the users as it should be possible to extract these from the datasets.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: