Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Failing test: X-Pack Jest Tests.x-pack/plugins/uptime/public/components/common/charts/__tests__ - PingHistogram component renders the component without errors #73522

Closed
kibanamachine opened this issue Jul 28, 2020 · 14 comments · Fixed by #73531
Assignees
Labels
failed-test A test failure on a tracked branch, potentially flaky-test Team:Uptime - DEPRECATED Synthetics & RUM sub-team of Application Observability

Comments

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

kibanamachine commented Jul 28, 2020

A test failed on a tracked branch

Error: expect(received).toMatchSnapshot()

Snapshot name: `PingHistogram component renders the component without errors 1`

- Snapshot
+ Received

@@ -3,11 +3,11 @@
      class="euiTitle euiTitle--xsmall"
    >
      Pings over time
    </h2>,
    <div
-     aria-label="Bar Chart showing uptime status over time from a year ago to a year ago."
+     aria-label="Bar Chart showing uptime status over time from 2 years ago to a year ago."
      style="height:100%;opacity:1;transition:opacity 0.2s"
    >
      <div
        class="echChart"
      >
    at Object.it (/dev/shm/workspace/kibana/x-pack/plugins/uptime/public/components/common/charts/__tests__/ping_histogram.test.tsx:58:23)
    at Object.asyncJestTest (/dev/shm/workspace/kibana/node_modules/jest-jasmine2/build/jasmineAsyncInstall.js:102:37)
    at resolve (/dev/shm/workspace/kibana/node_modules/jest-jasmine2/build/queueRunner.js:43:12)
    at new Promise (<anonymous>)
    at mapper (/dev/shm/workspace/kibana/node_modules/jest-jasmine2/build/queueRunner.js:26:19)
    at promise.then (/dev/shm/workspace/kibana/node_modules/jest-jasmine2/build/queueRunner.js:73:41)
    at process._tickCallback (internal/process/next_tick.js:68:7)

First failure: Jenkins Build

@kibanamachine kibanamachine added the failed-test A test failure on a tracked branch, potentially flaky-test label Jul 28, 2020
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/kibana-test-triage (failed-test)

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: Jenkins Build

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: Jenkins Build

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: Jenkins Build

@tylersmalley tylersmalley added the Team:Uptime - DEPRECATED Synthetics & RUM sub-team of Application Observability label Jul 28, 2020
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/uptime (Team:uptime)

@justinkambic justinkambic self-assigned this Jul 28, 2020
@tylersmalley
Copy link
Contributor

I am working on skipping these tests for now since they are happening across all branches.

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: Jenkins Build

@justinkambic
Copy link
Contributor

@tylersmalley I just put up #73531.

I'm fine with skipping these tests until we get that reviewed and merged though, since it'll get other devs back on track sooner.

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: Jenkins Build

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: Jenkins Build

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: Jenkins Build

@justinkambic
Copy link
Contributor

@tylersmalley is the fix we merged not working on 7.x?

@tylersmalley
Copy link
Contributor

They were just CI failures which were in progress. I just canceled the only other one which was running not containing the fix.

@justinkambic
Copy link
Contributor

👍 Ping me if there are any other problems related to the issue. Thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
failed-test A test failure on a tracked branch, potentially flaky-test Team:Uptime - DEPRECATED Synthetics & RUM sub-team of Application Observability
Projects
None yet
4 participants