You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In preparation for #27004, each saved object within kibana.saved_objects should have their own namespace attribute. With this change kibana.namespace can also be removed.
Current saved object reference mappings (to be enhanced):
Note, that we have also decided to remove the store field from the saved object references for now - it was intended to allow saved objects in separate indices (like task manager documents) to be referenced. We've decided to defer that for now, we can add it back later.
The existing search API will need to be updated.
I am kind of wondering if there's an aspect of the kibana.namespace that we want to keep - today I don't think it would ever be useful, except maybe for the case of logging action execution via http requests - the namespace value would be the namespace in the URI. I think we can delete it today, and add it back later if we need to.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is probably a good time to check in with folks looking at the Kibana Platform logging meta issue to show them our kibana top-level property, and saved object references in particular. It would be nice to align on these ...
In preparation for #27004, each saved object within
kibana.saved_objects
should have their ownnamespace
attribute. With this changekibana.namespace
can also be removed.Current saved object reference mappings (to be enhanced):
kibana/x-pack/plugins/event_log/generated/mappings.json
Lines 87 to 101 in 90e6f2c
Current namespace mapping (to be removed):
kibana/x-pack/plugins/event_log/generated/mappings.json
Lines 75 to 78 in 90e6f2c
Note, that we have also decided to remove the
store
field from the saved object references for now - it was intended to allow saved objects in separate indices (like task manager documents) to be referenced. We've decided to defer that for now, we can add it back later.The existing search API will need to be updated.
I am kind of wondering if there's an aspect of the
kibana.namespace
that we want to keep - today I don't think it would ever be useful, except maybe for the case of logging action execution via http requests - the namespace value would be the namespace in the URI. I think we can delete it today, and add it back later if we need to.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: