Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ML] Transforms: add support for percentiles aggregation #60010

Closed
hendrikmuhs opened this issue Mar 12, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #60763
Closed

[ML] Transforms: add support for percentiles aggregation #60010

hendrikmuhs opened this issue Mar 12, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #60763
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New value added to drive a business result Feature:Transforms ML transforms :ml v7.7.0

Comments

@hendrikmuhs
Copy link

Backend PR: elastic/elasticsearch#51808
Backend Issue: elastic/elasticsearch#51663

The backend added support for the percentiles aggregation which would be nice to have in the UI, too.

Requirements

  • be able to specify the output field, same as for single value aggs, however percentiles adds an object with subfields (not configurable)
  • be able to customize percentiles
@hendrikmuhs hendrikmuhs added enhancement New value added to drive a business result :ml Feature:Transforms ML transforms labels Mar 12, 2020
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/ml-ui (:ml)

@hendrikmuhs hendrikmuhs changed the title [Transform] add support for percentiles aggregation [ML][Transforms] add support for percentiles aggregation Mar 12, 2020
@hendrikmuhs hendrikmuhs changed the title [ML][Transforms] add support for percentiles aggregation [ML] Transforms: add support for percentiles aggregation Mar 12, 2020
@peteharverson peteharverson self-assigned this Mar 12, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New value added to drive a business result Feature:Transforms ML transforms :ml v7.7.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants