Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Failing test: X-Pack Detection Engine API Integration Tests.x-pack/test/detection_engine_api_integration/security_and_spaces/bundled_prebuilt_rules_package/install_latest_bundled_prebuilt_rules·ts - install_bundled_prebuilt_rules should install prebuilt rules from the package that comes bundled with Kibana #161802

Closed
Tracked by #161507
kibanamachine opened this issue Jul 12, 2023 · 6 comments
Closed
Tracked by #161507

Failing test: X-Pack Detection Engine API Integration Tests.x-pack/test/detection_engine_api_integration/security_and_spaces/bundled_prebuilt_rules_package/install_latest_bundled_prebuilt_rules·ts - install_bundled_prebuilt_rules should install prebuilt rules from the package that comes bundled with Kibana #161802

kibanamachine opened this issue Jul 12, 2023 · 6 comments
Assignees
@jpdjere
Labels
8.10 candidate failed-test A test failure on a tracked branch, potentially flaky-test Feature:Prebuilt Detection Rules Security Solution Prebuilt Detection Rules area Team:Detection Rule Management Security Detection Rule Management Team Team:Detections and Resp Security Detection Response Team Team: SecuritySolution Security Solutions Team working on SIEM, Endpoint, Timeline, Resolver, etc.

Comments

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

A test failed on a tracked branch

JestAssertionError: expect(received).toBeGreaterThan(expected)

Expected: > 0
Received:   0
    at Context.<anonymous> (install_latest_bundled_prebuilt_rules.ts:75:66)
    at processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:96:5)
    at Object.apply (wrap_function.js:73:16) {
  matcherResult: {
    message: '\x1B[2mexpect(\x1B[22m\x1B[31mreceived\x1B[39m\x1B[2m).\x1B[22mtoBeGreaterThan\x1B[2m(\x1B[22m\x1B[32mexpected\x1B[39m\x1B[2m)\x1B[22m\n' +
      '\n' +
      'Expected: > \x1B[32m0\x1B[39m\n' +
      'Received:   \x1B[31m0\x1B[39m',
    pass: false
  }
}

First failure: CI Build - 8.9
@kibanamachine kibanamachine added the failed-test A test failure on a tracked branch, potentially flaky-test label Jul 12, 2023
@botelastic botelastic bot added the needs-team Issues missing a team label label Jul 12, 2023
@kibanamachine kibanamachine added the Team: SecuritySolution Security Solutions Team working on SIEM, Endpoint, Timeline, Resolver, etc. label Jul 12, 2023
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/security-solution (Team: SecuritySolution)

@botelastic botelastic bot removed the needs-team Issues missing a team label label Jul 12, 2023
@MadameSheema MadameSheema added Team:Detections and Resp Security Detection Response Team Team:Detection Rule Management Security Detection Rule Management Team labels Jul 13, 2023
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/security-detections-response (Team:Detections and Resp)

@banderror banderror added Feature:Prebuilt Detection Rules Security Solution Prebuilt Detection Rules area 8.10 candidate and removed triage_needed labels Jul 13, 2023
@banderror banderror removed their assignment Jul 13, 2023
@banderror banderror mentioned this issue Jul 13, 2023
Closed
@jpdjere
Copy link
Contributor

jpdjere commented Jul 13, 2023

Running Flaky test runner on failing test:

https://buildkite.com/elastic/kibana-flaky-test-suite-runner/builds/2631

@jpdjere
Copy link
Contributor

jpdjere commented Jul 17, 2023

Re-running with more test runs: https://buildkite.com/elastic/kibana-flaky-test-suite-runner/builds/2651

Previous runs got 1 failing in 100 cases.

@jpdjere jpdjere mentioned this issue Jul 19, 2023
Merged
1 task
@jpdjere
Copy link
Contributor

jpdjere commented Jul 19, 2023

Re-running after possible fix:

https://buildkite.com/elastic/kibana-flaky-test-suite-runner/builds/2671

@jpdjere
Copy link
Contributor

jpdjere commented Jul 19, 2023

Fixed in: #161687

@jpdjere jpdjere closed this as completed Jul 19, 2023
@e40pud e40pud mentioned this issue Jul 19, 2023
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jpdjere jpdjere

Labels
8.10 candidate failed-test A test failure on a tracked branch, potentially flaky-test Feature:Prebuilt Detection Rules Security Solution Prebuilt Detection Rules area Team:Detection Rule Management Security Detection Rule Management Team Team:Detections and Resp Security Detection Response Team Team: SecuritySolution Security Solutions Team working on SIEM, Endpoint, Timeline, Resolver, etc.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
5 participants
@jpdjere @banderror @elasticmachine @MadameSheema @kibanamachine