Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test ZDT against serverless Elasticsearch #159804

Closed
rudolf opened this issue Jun 15, 2023 · 5 comments
Closed

Test ZDT against serverless Elasticsearch #159804

rudolf opened this issue Jun 15, 2023 · 5 comments
Labels
Epic:ZDTmigrations Zero downtime migrations Team:Core Core services & architecture: plugins, logging, config, saved objects, http, ES client, i18n, etc

Comments

@rudolf
Copy link
Contributor

rudolf commented Jun 15, 2023

We're currently running all migrations related integration and e2e tests against classic Elasticsearch. We should ensure we have coverage against serverless Elasticsearch for the ZDT algorithm and the actions it uses.

Additional tests we'll want to add

  • Test the presence of index.fast_refresh when creating SO indices against stateless ES
@rudolf rudolf added the Epic:ZDTmigrations Zero downtime migrations label Jun 15, 2023
@botelastic botelastic bot added the needs-team Issues missing a team label label Jun 15, 2023
@mbondyra mbondyra added the Team:Core Core services & architecture: plugins, logging, config, saved objects, http, ES client, i18n, etc label Jun 19, 2023
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/kibana-core (Team:Core)

@botelastic botelastic bot removed the needs-team Issues missing a team label label Jun 19, 2023
@pgayvallet
Copy link
Contributor

Depends on https://github.com/elastic/appex-qa-team/issues/38 (private repo)

@pgayvallet
Copy link
Contributor

One of the thing we'll want to test is the presence of the index.fast_refresh index setting, which should be added on all our system indices when creating them (see https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch-serverless/pull/449 - private repo)

@pgayvallet
Copy link
Contributor

@rudolf given #164959 was merged, are we good closing this, or do we want to add more coverage?

@rudolf
Copy link
Contributor Author

rudolf commented Oct 11, 2023

Yes, closed in #164959 🥳

@rudolf rudolf closed this as completed Oct 11, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Epic:ZDTmigrations Zero downtime migrations Team:Core Core services & architecture: plugins, logging, config, saved objects, http, ES client, i18n, etc
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants