Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[APM] Comparison using expected bounds should not show on individual transactions #143729

Closed
LucaWintergerst opened this issue Oct 20, 2022 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Fixes for quality problems that affect the customer experience Team:APM All issues that need APM UI Team support

Comments

@LucaWintergerst
Copy link
Contributor

Kibana version: 8.5.0 BC

Describe the bug:

The ML Job used for the expected bounds comparison is evaluating the overall number of transactions and their latency. It's not split by transaction.name

Therefore when displaying the expected bounds on top of individual transactions, the comparison does not make sense as it's always higher unless the service only has a single transaction.name

Overall Service (this works as expected)
Screenshot 2022-10-20 at 11 02 51

Individual Transaction (this does not work)
Screenshot 2022-10-20 at 11 02 34

Easy fix is to just disable the comparison for the individual views.
Longer term better fix could be to evaluate a multi metric job which splits the results by each unique transaction.name

@LucaWintergerst LucaWintergerst added bug Fixes for quality problems that affect the customer experience Team:APM All issues that need APM UI Team support labels Oct 20, 2022
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/apm-ui (Team:APM)

@qn895 qn895 self-assigned this Oct 20, 2022
@sorenlouv
Copy link
Member

@qn895 Thanks for self-assigning. Let me know if I can do anything to help out. Do you think it's possible to get a fix into 8.6 and backport to 8.5?

@gbamparop
Copy link
Contributor

@qn895 do you have all the information that you need for this issue? Are you planning to work on it or you would rather have the APM team work on it?

@qn895
Copy link
Member

qn895 commented May 23, 2023

Closing this via #155915

@qn895 qn895 closed this as completed May 23, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Fixes for quality problems that affect the customer experience Team:APM All issues that need APM UI Team support
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants