[Meta] Integrations Beta to GA

[rameshelastic]

This is a meta issue to track progress of moving packages from Beta to GA.

Phase 1

Preview Give feedback

1. Make Couchbase GA #6049
   Team:Service-Integrations +1
   
2. Make IBMMQ GA #6050
   Team:Service-Integrations +1
   
3. Make Microsoft SqlServer performance & transaction_log & error_log GA #6056
   Team:Service-Integrations +1
   
4. Make Nagios XI GA #6052
   Team:Service-Integrations +1
   
5. Make Oracle Weblogic GA #6054
   Team:Service-Integrations +1
   
6. Make MemCached GA #6055
   Team:Service-Integrations +1
   

Phase 2

Preview Give feedback

1. [O11y] Make CouchDB GA #7253
   Integration:couchdb +1
   
2. [O11y] Make CEPH GA #7441
   Integration:ceph +1
   
3. [O11y] Make Citrix ADC GA #7243
   Integration:Citrix-Netscaler +1
   
4. Make Golang GA #7239
   Integration:golang +1
   
5. Make PHP-FPM GA #7211
   Integration:php_fpm +1
   
6. [O11y] Make WebSphere Application Server GA #7281
   Integration:websphere_application_server +1
   
7. [O11y] Make Apache Tomcat GA #7363
   Integration:apache_tomcat +1
   
8. [O11y] Make Springboot GA #7289
   Integration:spring_boot +1
   
9. Make Apache Spark GA #7406
   Integration:apache_spark +1
   
10. [O11y] Make Hadoop GA #7412
    Integration:hadoop +1
    

Phase 3

Preview Give feedback

1. Make ActiveMQ GA #6048
   6 of 7
   Team:Service-Integrations +1
   
2. https://github.com/elastic/obs-infraobs-team/issues/1104
3. [meta] [etcd] GA Migration #8441
   +0
   

Yet to be picked up.

Salesforce - There are multiple client issues that are opened so it is not picked up yet

[ishleenk17]

There is a difference in packages being in Technical preview and Beta as per Semantic Versioning.
We should just have that in mind as well before taking it to GA.

[lalit-satapathy]

@muthu-mps, Can we summarise the meta with key findings of the migration?

[muthu-mps]

Key Findings

ActiveMQ

ActiveMQ comes with two flavours, Classic and Artemis. We have an enhancement request to collect Artemis metrics. The current integration supports classic version. We need to evaluate and make a call on whether we can make the ActiveMQ GA without having Artemis implementation. Initiated discussions in the ActiveMQ issue.

https://github.com/elastic/enhancements/issues/11568

• Are we considering Artemis for making ActiveMQ GA ? YES / NO

This integration will be considered for next iteration.

Couchbase

The sync-gateway host configuration is mandatory. This config should be optional as the metrics collection for sync-gateway can be enabled or disabled. When disabling the metrics collection the user should not be forced to provide the host configuration. Created an issue to make the configuration optional.

• [Couchbase] - Make sync-gateway host configuration Optional #6248

IBMMQ

• what is missing ?

  Currently we are collecting queue manager metrics. Here we are not collecting the queue and channel metrics. There may be multiple queue in a queue manager. There should be a way to segregate metrics based on queue and channel.

• Nice to Have:

  Add Queues, Topics and Channel metrics to the integrations.
  Queue usage and messages processed in a queue are more valuable metrics.
  Queue depth metrics. This helps deciding on adding more messages to a queue.

  • Can we consider the additional metrics to be collected before making the integration GA ? NO

• Enhancement Request on new way of collecting the metrics other than using prometheus

  https://github.com/elastic/enhancements/issues/18669

  • Using Go client for collecting metrics ? NO

MicrosoftSQLServer Performance & Transaction Log Datastream

The connection string with backslash is pre-encoded and provided as an input. This workaround is provided for the domain users to connect without issues. The idea here is to encode the the domain user names internally without asking customer to enter the encoded string as an input.

NagiosXI

No blockers.

Oracle Weblogic

The current metrics doesn't include JVM heap usage, connection_pool and channel metrics data. These are the key KPI's user will be looking for. Are we consider adding the above metrics ? No

Created a separate issue to track - #6511

MemCached

https://github.com/elastic/observability-dev/issues/2313. Do we consider this enhancement before making GA ? NO

Note:

After performing analysis on the above findings the decision is to make integrations GA except ActiveMQ.

[rameshelastic]

Added Phase 2 as part of planning for next sprint.

cc: @milan-elastic

[lalit-satapathy]

@milan-elastic, @muthu-mps,

Do we have any packages pending GA on this list above?

[milan-elastic]

@lalit-satapathy From above list Salesforce is yet to GA as we are working on revamping it, apart from that ActiveMQ is not GA. @muthu-mps can share more details on ActiveMQ

[muthu-mps]

@lalit-satapathy - ActiveMQ is pending because we have to migrate from Classic to Artemis version of it. The discussion is captured in the issue .

[muthu-mps]

The phase 3 migrations competed.