You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I get that this behavior is not something you'd typically want to do. But is there any reason for a shard of size x documents to allocate a docid container of size y, where y > x?
In the more general case: We do most of our (normal-sized) searches against aliases that point to a few big indexes and a couple dozen smaller indexes. Statically allocating memory for all potential result document IDs on every shard sounds like it's wasting precious memory, especially if not all indexes will produce any hits.
To reproduce:
I expect to be able to set a high search size to return all total values, even if all the indexes are small.
Happens in v. 1.1.2. I haven't tested other versions yet.
I can create a Java Unit test sometime later if you need me to.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: