You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Elasticsearch version (bin/elasticsearch --version): reported in 7.5
Description of the problem including expected versus actual behavior:
When Watcher's email action is run multiple times thanks to foreach parameter, then all generated email messages use the same Message-ID header.
RFC2392 states that Message-ID should be unique: Both message-id and content-id are required to be globally unique. That is, no two different messages will ever have the same Message-ID addr-spec;
A similar issue was fixed in the past #30112 by adding action_id to Message-ID. With foreach it's not enough since we have one action but generate multiple email messages.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Bummer! I am having this problem as well. It is preventing delivery of Watcher alerts to our ticketing system as the receiving system insists on strict adherence to RFC2392 Message-ID uniqueness.
I'm seeing the same issue on our side, getting the same Message-ID even when the body of the messages are different. This results in missing alerts in our ticketing system (which doesn't support Webhook).
Elasticsearch version (
bin/elasticsearch --version
): reported in 7.5Description of the problem including expected versus actual behavior:
When Watcher's email action is run multiple times thanks to foreach parameter, then all generated email messages use the same Message-ID header.
RFC2392 states that Message-ID should be unique:
Both message-id and content-id are required to be globally unique. That is, no two different messages will ever have the same Message-ID addr-spec;
A similar issue was fixed in the past #30112 by adding action_id to Message-ID. With
foreach
it's not enough since we have one action but generate multiple email messages.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: