Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve local exporter log message during rolling upgrade #29895

Closed
elasticmachine opened this issue Mar 23, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Improve local exporter log message during rolling upgrade #29895

elasticmachine opened this issue Mar 23, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Original comment by @luizgpsantos:

During a rolling upgrade the local exporter prints this log message even when the recent upgraded node has x-pack installed:

[2018-03-08TXX:XX:XX,XXX][INFO ][o.e.x.m.e.l.LocalExporter] waiting for elected master
node [{node1}{oy2s7SAsTd-wWcUvIlZ1Qe}{nROAp2n6Rg2qaMhUq43sta}{10.10.10.1}{10.10.10.1:9300}
{ml.machine_memory=128558536, ml.max_open_jobs=20, ml.enabled=true}] to setup local exporter 
[default_local] (does it have x-pack installed?)

Any untypical message during an upgrade can scary the user. Can we think of a more straightforward message that points the version divergence?

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Original comment by @jaijhala:

The log info is a bit misleading, I noticed it as well.
Related discussion -> #28974

@Rohlik
Copy link

Rohlik commented Jan 8, 2020

I also find this log in my logfile.

@rjernst rjernst added the Team:Data Management Meta label for data/management team label May 4, 2020
@dakrone
Copy link
Member

dakrone commented May 8, 2024

Internal monitoring has been deprecated for quite a while, and we're no longer doing any active development on it. I'm going to close this issue.

@dakrone dakrone closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale May 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants