Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Does vendor device info get mapped to the agent.* fields? #227

Closed
MikePaquette opened this issue Dec 4, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

Does vendor device info get mapped to the agent.* fields? #227

MikePaquette opened this issue Dec 4, 2018 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@MikePaquette
Copy link
Contributor

When a vendor generates log data, is the thought that we’d be recording the vendor name as an “agent” field? If so, like if it was a “Cisco ASA 1000” appliance, agent.name = “cisco-asa”, agent.type = “1000” ? I’m thinking having vendor and model fields would make this more helpful for customers. Especially if you have filebeat running on different appliances and you want to distinguish log sources by vendor.

No. 10 of 16. This question was asked by a new ECS user, who is familiar with mapping IT events to data models and use cases in other schemas. These questions are being posted as a GitHub issue, because a) they may offer valuable insights. b) we expect that many new users will have similar questions.

@MikePaquette MikePaquette added the question Further information is requested label Dec 4, 2018
@MikePaquette
Copy link
Contributor Author

In ECS, devices like “Cisco ASA 1000” appliances are usually considered observers, not agents. The details you mention would be populated in the observer.* fields, for example:

  • observer.type: "firewall"
  • observer.vendor "Cisco"
  • observer.version: <version_info>
  • observer.serial_number: <serial_number>

One field that seems to be missing would be observer.model which in the case, would contain:

  • observer.model: "ASA 1000"

image

@MikePaquette MikePaquette self-assigned this Dec 10, 2018
@ebeahan ebeahan assigned djptek and unassigned MikePaquette Nov 16, 2021
@djptek
Copy link
Contributor

djptek commented Nov 16, 2021

Very similar issue under discussion here, #1512

Closing

@djptek djptek closed this as completed Nov 16, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants