Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
We could implement it for conditional applier, but we could only use the underlying applier's AST and ignore the condition. I didn't think it was prudent to return the AST when it was the "whole" AST, so I left it unimplemented. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I'm having difficulty extracting the pattern representing the rhs of my rewrite rule if it is a conditional rewrite rule.
For standard rewrites, using applier.get_pattern_ast() works great! It doesn't seem to return anything for a conditional applier though?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions