feat(data): new API to search Readings by multiple resource names

[judehung]

Add a new Get API that will accept multiple resource names in the payload as the query criteria.
GET /reading/device/name/{deviceName}/start/{start}/end/{end}

the query payload would be:

{
"resourceNames": ["r1", "r2", "r3"]
}

If the resourceNames or the payload is empty, return all the Readings meet the deviceName and in the start/end timestamp

Signed-off-by: Jude Hung [email protected]

closes #3693

If your build fails due to your commit message not passing the build checks, please review the guidelines here: https://github.com/edgexfoundry/edgex-go/blob/main/.github/Contributing.md

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

• I am not introducing a breaking change (if you are, flag in conventional commit message with BREAKING CHANGE: describing the break)
• I am not introducing a new dependency (add notes below if you are)
• I have added unit tests for the new feature or bug fix (if not, why?)
• I have fully tested (add details below) this the new feature or bug fix (if not, why?)
• I have opened a PR for the related docs change (if not, why?) This PR updates openapi doc to describe the new API.

Testing Instructions

1. Modify the edgex-go's go.mod to replace the core-contracts lib
2. Run core-data
3. Add several events and readings with various resource name under the same device name. Query readings through following API verify if expected readings are returned:
   GET reading/device/name/{deviceName}/start/{start}/end/{end}

New Dependency Instructions (If applicable)

[lenny-goodell]

LGTM

[judehung]

rebased and update go.mod, go.sum to pick up the latest version of go-mod-core-contracts.

[sonarqubecloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

No Coverage information
No Duplication information

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #3766 (dff1392) into main (4de7b29) will decrease coverage by 0.21%.
The diff coverage is 26.78%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3766      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   46.21%   45.99%   -0.22%     
==========================================
  Files         112      112              
  Lines        9479     9583     +104     
==========================================
+ Hits         4381     4408      +27     
- Misses       4718     4794      +76     
- Partials      380      381       +1     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
internal/pkg/infrastructure/redis/client.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
internal/pkg/infrastructure/redis/queries.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
internal/pkg/infrastructure/redis/reading.go	10.49% <0.00%> (-0.89%)	⬇️
internal/core/data/application/reading.go	44.53% <5.26%> (-5.93%)	⬇️
internal/core/data/controller/http/reading.go	85.87% <80.55%> (-1.45%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4de7b29...dff1392. Read the comment docs.

[lenny-goodell]

LGTM