feat: Add secure MessageBus capability #816
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
12 tasks
jim-wang-intel
requested changes
May 6, 2021
AlexCuse
previously approved these changes
May 6, 2021
lenny-goodell
dismissed stale reviews from AlexCuse and jim-wang-intel
via
568cb97
lenny-goodell
force-pushed
the
secure-bus
branch
4 times, most recently
from
28e3018 to
7f384aa
Compare
added 2 commits
May 7, 2021 12:02
closes #598 Signed-off-by: lenny <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: lenny <[email protected]>
lenny-goodell
force-pushed
the
secure-bus
branch
2 times, most recently
from
adc74fd to
451ea15
Compare
closes #598 Signed-off-by: lenny <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: lenny <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The PR is dependent on edgexfoundry/go-mod-bootstrap#225
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
General secure MessageBus capability does not exists
Issue Number: #598
What is the new behavior?
General secure MessageBus capability now exists
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Are there any new imports or modules? If so, what are they used for and why?
no
Are there any specific instructions or things that should be known prior to reviewing?
Other information