You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Releasing KIT for logistics, content so far: vision, mission and benefits, digital twin for transport unit and transport itself as well as matching aspect models like "PackingList" and "ShippingData". Seems to be as draft and transfer-vehicle to continue work on this topic in new setup in association.
What's the benefit?
Provide logistic and customs data in CX standardized way and cover the gap of data between supplier and customer
What are the Risks/Dependencies ?
Dependencies: Traceability + Industry Core, EG Digital Twins
Detailed explanation
Current implementation
no current implementation excisting, it's the first KIT for logstic and customs use case
The impact on the overall system architecture has been assessed. The Feature does not require changes to the architecture or any existing standard? Please have a look here on the overarching architecture
Potential risks or conflicts with existing architecture has been assessed
Justification:(Fill this out, if at least one of the checkboxes above cannot be ticked. Contact the Architecture Management Committee to get an approval for the justification)
Additional information
I am aware that my request may not be developed if no developer can be found for it. I'll try to contribute a developer (bring your own developer)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @corinastolz, hi @tunacicek , this feature is q duplicat to #934. Both aim to create a kit for ligistics and customs. I think, we have to delete an of them.
Overview
Releasing KIT for logistics, content so far: vision, mission and benefits, digital twin for transport unit and transport itself as well as matching aspect models like "PackingList" and "ShippingData". Seems to be as draft and transfer-vehicle to continue work on this topic in new setup in association.
What's the benefit?
Provide logistic and customs data in CX standardized way and cover the gap of data between supplier and customer
What are the Risks/Dependencies ?
Dependencies: Traceability + Industry Core, EG Digital Twins
Detailed explanation
Current implementation
no current implementation excisting, it's the first KIT for logstic and customs use case
Proposed improvements
KIT for logistics and customs are available
Feature Team
EG Traceability
Contributor
Committer
####@tunacicek
####@danielmiehle
User Stories
Acceptance Criteria
Logistic & Customs KIT is documentated and available
Ensure compability with Logistic Standard CX-0150
Initial PR
Final PR
Test Cases
Not necessary, it is only a KIT documentation
Architectural Relevance
The following items are ensured (answer: yes) after this issue is implemented:
Justification: (Fill this out, if at least one of the checkboxes above cannot be ticked. Contact the Architecture Management Committee to get an approval for the justification)
Additional information
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: