Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove or replace the logo #250

Closed
2 of 3 tasks
keilw opened this issue Nov 2, 2020 · 6 comments
Closed
2 of 3 tasks

Remove or replace the logo #250

keilw opened this issue Nov 2, 2020 · 6 comments
Labels

Comments

@keilw
Copy link
Contributor

keilw commented Nov 2, 2020

Even for an Eclipse project, using the Duke mascot seems inappropriate and should be changed.
Either we replace the logo with something else or remove it for the time being.

We have to remove/replace the logo in multiple places

  • JNoSql.org site
  • This repo and README
  • Eclipse.org Wiki
@keilw keilw added the task label Nov 2, 2020
@otaviojava
Copy link
Contributor

As far I know, there is no logo in the Jakarta NoSQL, only to JNoSQL.
But I'll review the documentation again.

@keilw
Copy link
Contributor Author

keilw commented Nov 2, 2020

The Duke mascot is not allowed for Eclipse projects, as long as "JNOSQL" stands for the compatible implementatoin that means we also have to replace it there.

@otaviojava
Copy link
Contributor

Duke is a BSB license.
https://www.oracle.com/java/duke.html
The MVC, Bean Validation also have been using it.

@keilw
Copy link
Contributor Author

keilw commented Nov 2, 2020

While they were under the JCP, I don't see https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/krazo use it, hence this one should not use it either. It's Eclipse branding practices. While a JUG may be fine to use Duke, an Eclipse project shouldn't.
I noticed it in the beanvalidation.org site, so I asked jakartaee/validation-spec#264 about their use of Duke. The MVC site is outdated and only refers to 1.0 where it was still OK to use it.

@keilw
Copy link
Contributor Author

keilw commented Nov 3, 2020

@otaviojava See jakartaee/validation-spec#264 (comment) that means, we must also change or remove the Duke-based logo here. It is fine to use Duke images in the documentation where it helps, but the logo itself must be "Duke-less".

@otaviojava
Copy link
Contributor

@keilw I'll remove the logo from the readme.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants