From 18744cde01bfdafacef1de33e3c73555ac940771 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: jonathanmetzman <31354670+jonathanmetzman@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2023 21:19:45 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Don't use -fsanitize=fuzzer-no-link with centipede (#9610)

It's pointless and has these drawbacks:
1. It add useless instrumentation not used by centipede that slows down
the target
2. It adds instrumentation that expects an implementation at link time
(__sancov_lowest_stack) which can break projects builds.

Fixes https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/issues/9609
Related: https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/issues/9299
https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/issues/9583
---
 infra/base-images/base-builder/compile | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/infra/base-images/base-builder/compile b/infra/base-images/base-builder/compile
index 5144f4cc9326..0cbb21b4ea28 100755
--- a/infra/base-images/base-builder/compile
+++ b/infra/base-images/base-builder/compile
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ then
 fi
 
  # Don't need coverage instrumentation for engine-less, afl++ builds.
-if [ $FUZZING_ENGINE = "none" ] || [ $FUZZING_ENGINE = "afl" ]; then
+if [ $FUZZING_ENGINE = "none" ] || [ $FUZZING_ENGINE = "afl" ] || [ $FUZZING_ENGINE = "centipede" ] ; then
   export COVERAGE_FLAGS=
 fi