Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
A NAYY 4x50 cable already consists of 3 phases (+ 1 return), thus the 4x50. Here is a picture for clarification. It is just one cable - so, the values are correct, and no change is necessary. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
I just understood my mistake.. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
This discution is related to #this unactepted PR
Problem :
here is an extract of the Pandapower Basic Standard Types line :
here,
max_i_ka = 142A
correspond to the admissible current in one wire. This assumption is made according to classical constructor datasheet of thermal limit given per wire :So,
max_i_ka
in pandapower is not the admissible current in one 3ph line system.In the code we have :
res_line_df["loading_percent"].values[:] = i_ka / i_max * 100
Where
i_ka
is considered as the equivalent current going through 3 wire.The fact that
i_ka
andi_max_ka
are not for the same system (1 wire or the full cable) make the equation false.Do you guys agree with me ?
Suggestion :
I can do a PR to change :
res_line_df["loading_percent"].values[:] = i_ka / i_max / 3 * 100
Best regard !
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions