-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 70
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor(p2p): rename p2p block event #1006
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent changes enhance the P2P communication layer by transitioning from the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant Manager
participant BlockSync
participant Validator
Client->>Manager: Send BlockData
Manager->>BlockSync: Forward BlockData
BlockSync->>Validator: Validate BlockData
Validator-->>BlockSync: Validation Result
BlockSync-->>Manager: Sync Outcome
Manager-->>Client: Sync Confirmation
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
p2p/pb/blockdata.pb.go
is excluded by!**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (8)
- block/p2p.go (2 hunks)
- p2p/block.go (1 hunks)
- p2p/block_sync.go (2 hunks)
- p2p/block_sync_test.go (1 hunks)
- p2p/client.go (2 hunks)
- p2p/validator.go (1 hunks)
- p2p/validator_test.go (1 hunks)
- proto/p2p/blockdata.proto (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (15)
proto/p2p/blockdata.proto (1)
8-8
: Renaming toBlockData
aligns with naming conventions.The change from
GossipedBlock
toBlockData
simplifies the naming and enhances clarity. This aligns with the objectives of the PR to improve naming conventions.p2p/block_sync_test.go (1)
36-36
: Update toBlockData
maintains test consistency.Changing the type of
gossipedBlock
toBlockData
aligns with the renaming effort and maintains consistency in the test logic.p2p/block.go (5)
13-19
: Introduction ofBlockData
struct is well-structured.The
BlockData
struct encapsulates block and commit data effectively, aligning with the objectives of simplifying data handling in the P2P layer.
21-24
: Efficient serialization withMarshalBinary
.The
MarshalBinary
method uses protobuf for efficient serialization, which is a best practice for handling binary data.
26-35
: Robust deserialization withUnmarshalBinary
.The
UnmarshalBinary
method ensures that the binary data is correctly transformed back into aBlockData
instance, handling errors appropriately.
37-43
: Protobuf conversion methods ensure compatibility.The
ToProto
andFromProto
methods facilitate seamless conversion betweenBlockData
and its protobuf representation, ensuring compatibility across different components.
56-74
: Comprehensive validation logic inValidate
.The
Validate
method performs thorough checks on the block and commit data, ensuring data integrity and consistency with the header.block/p2p.go (2)
67-67
: Ensure consistency in type usage forBlockData
.The change to use
p2p.BlockData
in thegossipBlock
method aligns with the renaming objectives. Verify that theBlockData
type is consistently used across all related components.
14-14
: Verify type assertion forBlockData
.Ensure that the type assertion for
eventData
top2p.BlockData
is correct and that all instances ofP2PBlockEvent
have been updated throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Verification Successful: Type assertion for
BlockData
is correct.All instances of
P2PBlockEvent
have been updated toBlockData
across the codebase, confirming the consistency and correctness of the changes.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all instances of `P2PBlockEvent` have been updated to `BlockData`. # Test: Search for any remaining instances of `P2PBlockEvent`. Expect: No matches. rg --type go 'P2PBlockEvent'Length of output: 28
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Re-run the search for any remaining instances of `P2PBlockEvent` in the codebase. rg --type go 'P2PBlockEvent'Length of output: 28
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for instances of `BlockData` to verify its usage in the codebase. rg --type go 'BlockData'Length of output: 4436
p2p/validator.go (1)
74-74
: ConfirmBlockData
integration inBlockValidator
.The change to use
BlockData
instead ofP2PBlockEvent
inBlockValidator
aligns with the renaming objectives. Ensure that theBlockData
type is correctly integrated and validated across the codebase.p2p/block_sync.go (2)
42-42
: UpdateBlockSyncMessageHandler
to useBlockData
.The update to use
BlockData
inBlockSyncMessageHandler
aligns with the renaming objectives. Ensure that all handlers using this type are updated accordingly.
102-109
: EnsureBlockData
is properly utilized inLoadBlock
.The changes in the
LoadBlock
method reflect the transition toBlockData
. Verify that the deserialization and error handling correctly accommodate the new type.p2p/validator_test.go (1)
171-171
: Ensure consistency with type changes.The type change from
P2PBlockEvent
toBlockData
aligns with the PR's objective. Verify that all usages ofgossipedBlock
are consistent with the new type definition and that the test logic remains valid.Verification successful
Consistency with
BlockData
type changes verified.The transition from
P2PBlockEvent
toBlockData
is consistent across the codebase. The usages ofBlockData
, including serialization, validation, and event handling, align with the expected behavior. The test logic inp2p/validator_test.go
and other related files remains valid with the new type definition.
- Files and Usages:
p2p/validator.go
: Deserialization and validation ofgossipedBlock
.p2p/validator_test.go
: Serialization and test setup forgossipedBlock
.p2p/client.go
: Handling ofBlockData
in block synchronization.p2p/block.go
: Definition and methods forBlockData
.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all usages of `BlockData` are consistent with the new type definition. # Test: Search for the `BlockData` type usage. Expect: Consistent usage across the codebase. rg --type go -A 5 $'BlockData'Length of output: 12419
p2p/client.go (2)
502-502
: Update parameter type inblockSyncReceived
.The parameter type change from
P2PBlockEvent
toBlockData
should be reflected in any documentation or comments related to this method. Ensure that the method's logic aligns with the new type definition.Verification successful
Parameter type update verification successful.
The
blockSyncReceived
method inp2p/client.go
is correctly updated to useBlockData
, and the associated comment aligns with this change. No additional documentation updates are necessary within the observed context.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the `blockSyncReceived` method is correctly updated to use `BlockData`. # Test: Search for the `blockSyncReceived` method usage. Expect: Consistent usage across the codebase. rg --type go -A 5 $'blockSyncReceived'Length of output: 1196
513-513
: Update variable type inblockGossipReceived
.The variable
gossipedBlock
has been updated toBlockData
. Ensure that all operations withinblockGossipReceived
are compatible with theBlockData
type and that any related documentation is updated.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
changed the title.
if it's touches source code, shouldn't be a chore
but refactor (if doesn't change logic).
PR Standards
Opening a pull request should be able to meet the following requirements
--
PR naming convention: https://hackmd.io/@nZpxHZ0CT7O5ngTp0TP9mg/HJP_jrm7A
Close #1005
<-- Briefly describe the content of this pull request -->
For Author:
godoc
commentsFor Reviewer:
After reviewer approval:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
BlockData
structure for improved handling of block data in the P2P communication layer.Bug Fixes
BlockData
across various components.Documentation
GossipedBlock
toBlockData
for better clarity on its purpose.Tests
BlockData
type, ensuring accurate testing of block synchronization and validation.