Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(p2p): rename p2p block event #1006

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 12, 2024
Merged

Conversation

srene
Copy link
Contributor

@srene srene commented Aug 9, 2024

PR Standards

Opening a pull request should be able to meet the following requirements

--

PR naming convention: https://hackmd.io/@nZpxHZ0CT7O5ngTp0TP9mg/HJP_jrm7A


Close #1005

<-- Briefly describe the content of this pull request -->

For Author:

  • Targeted PR against correct branch
  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design
  • Targets only one github issue
  • Wrote unit and integration tests
  • All CI checks have passed
  • Added relevant godoc comments

For Reviewer:

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • Reviewers assigned
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed

After reviewer approval:

  • In case targets main branch, PR should be squashed and merged.
  • In case PR targets a release branch, PR should be rebased.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new BlockData structure for improved handling of block data in the P2P communication layer.
    • Enhanced serialization and deserialization methods for block data using Protocol Buffers.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved type safety by replacing outdated event data structures with BlockData across various components.
  • Documentation

    • Updated protocol buffer message naming from GossipedBlock to BlockData for better clarity on its purpose.
  • Tests

    • Adjusted test cases to reflect the updated BlockData type, ensuring accurate testing of block synchronization and validation.

@srene srene requested a review from a team as a code owner August 9, 2024 14:05
@srene srene self-assigned this Aug 9, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 9, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes enhance the P2P communication layer by transitioning from the P2PBlockEvent type to a more streamlined BlockData structure. This update improves type safety and clarity across various components handling block synchronization, serialization, and validation. The modifications ensure that block data is consistently represented and processed within the network, aligning with the objectives of simplifying the codebase.

Changes

Files Change Summary
block/p2p.go, p2p/block_sync.go, p2p/client.go, p2p/validator.go, p2p/block_sync_test.go, p2p/validator_test.go Updated event and variable types from P2PBlockEvent to BlockData, enhancing type safety and consistency.
p2p/block.go Introduced the BlockData struct with methods for serialization and validation of block data.
proto/p2p/blockdata.proto Renamed protocol buffer message from GossipedBlock to BlockData to better reflect its purpose.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant Manager
    participant BlockSync
    participant Validator
    
    Client->>Manager: Send BlockData
    Manager->>BlockSync: Forward BlockData
    BlockSync->>Validator: Validate BlockData
    Validator-->>BlockSync: Validation Result
    BlockSync-->>Manager: Sync Outcome
    Manager-->>Client: Sync Confirmation
Loading

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
P2PBlockEvent type starts with package name (#1005)

🐰 In the realm of code so sleek,
A shift to BlockData we now seek.
With types refined, our path is clear,
For blocks to gossip far and near.
Hooray for changes, let’s all cheer! 🎉


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@srene srene requested a review from danwt August 9, 2024 14:06
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d3b4311 and 06231db.

Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • p2p/pb/blockdata.pb.go is excluded by !**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (8)
  • block/p2p.go (2 hunks)
  • p2p/block.go (1 hunks)
  • p2p/block_sync.go (2 hunks)
  • p2p/block_sync_test.go (1 hunks)
  • p2p/client.go (2 hunks)
  • p2p/validator.go (1 hunks)
  • p2p/validator_test.go (1 hunks)
  • proto/p2p/blockdata.proto (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (15)
proto/p2p/blockdata.proto (1)

8-8: Renaming to BlockData aligns with naming conventions.

The change from GossipedBlock to BlockData simplifies the naming and enhances clarity. This aligns with the objectives of the PR to improve naming conventions.

p2p/block_sync_test.go (1)

36-36: Update to BlockData maintains test consistency.

Changing the type of gossipedBlock to BlockData aligns with the renaming effort and maintains consistency in the test logic.

p2p/block.go (5)

13-19: Introduction of BlockData struct is well-structured.

The BlockData struct encapsulates block and commit data effectively, aligning with the objectives of simplifying data handling in the P2P layer.


21-24: Efficient serialization with MarshalBinary.

The MarshalBinary method uses protobuf for efficient serialization, which is a best practice for handling binary data.


26-35: Robust deserialization with UnmarshalBinary.

The UnmarshalBinary method ensures that the binary data is correctly transformed back into a BlockData instance, handling errors appropriately.


37-43: Protobuf conversion methods ensure compatibility.

The ToProto and FromProto methods facilitate seamless conversion between BlockData and its protobuf representation, ensuring compatibility across different components.


56-74: Comprehensive validation logic in Validate.

The Validate method performs thorough checks on the block and commit data, ensuring data integrity and consistency with the header.

block/p2p.go (2)

67-67: Ensure consistency in type usage for BlockData.

The change to use p2p.BlockData in the gossipBlock method aligns with the renaming objectives. Verify that the BlockData type is consistently used across all related components.


14-14: Verify type assertion for BlockData.

Ensure that the type assertion for eventData to p2p.BlockData is correct and that all instances of P2PBlockEvent have been updated throughout the codebase.

Verification successful

Verification Successful: Type assertion for BlockData is correct.

All instances of P2PBlockEvent have been updated to BlockData across the codebase, confirming the consistency and correctness of the changes.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all instances of `P2PBlockEvent` have been updated to `BlockData`.

# Test: Search for any remaining instances of `P2PBlockEvent`. Expect: No matches.
rg --type go 'P2PBlockEvent'

Length of output: 28


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Re-run the search for any remaining instances of `P2PBlockEvent` in the codebase.
rg --type go 'P2PBlockEvent'

Length of output: 28


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for instances of `BlockData` to verify its usage in the codebase.
rg --type go 'BlockData'

Length of output: 4436

p2p/validator.go (1)

74-74: Confirm BlockData integration in BlockValidator.

The change to use BlockData instead of P2PBlockEvent in BlockValidator aligns with the renaming objectives. Ensure that the BlockData type is correctly integrated and validated across the codebase.

p2p/block_sync.go (2)

42-42: Update BlockSyncMessageHandler to use BlockData.

The update to use BlockData in BlockSyncMessageHandler aligns with the renaming objectives. Ensure that all handlers using this type are updated accordingly.


102-109: Ensure BlockData is properly utilized in LoadBlock.

The changes in the LoadBlock method reflect the transition to BlockData. Verify that the deserialization and error handling correctly accommodate the new type.

p2p/validator_test.go (1)

171-171: Ensure consistency with type changes.

The type change from P2PBlockEvent to BlockData aligns with the PR's objective. Verify that all usages of gossipedBlock are consistent with the new type definition and that the test logic remains valid.

Verification successful

Consistency with BlockData type changes verified.

The transition from P2PBlockEvent to BlockData is consistent across the codebase. The usages of BlockData, including serialization, validation, and event handling, align with the expected behavior. The test logic in p2p/validator_test.go and other related files remains valid with the new type definition.

  • Files and Usages:
    • p2p/validator.go: Deserialization and validation of gossipedBlock.
    • p2p/validator_test.go: Serialization and test setup for gossipedBlock.
    • p2p/client.go: Handling of BlockData in block synchronization.
    • p2p/block.go: Definition and methods for BlockData.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all usages of `BlockData` are consistent with the new type definition.

# Test: Search for the `BlockData` type usage. Expect: Consistent usage across the codebase.
rg --type go -A 5 $'BlockData'

Length of output: 12419

p2p/client.go (2)

502-502: Update parameter type in blockSyncReceived.

The parameter type change from P2PBlockEvent to BlockData should be reflected in any documentation or comments related to this method. Ensure that the method's logic aligns with the new type definition.

Verification successful

Parameter type update verification successful.

The blockSyncReceived method in p2p/client.go is correctly updated to use BlockData, and the associated comment aligns with this change. No additional documentation updates are necessary within the observed context.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the `blockSyncReceived` method is correctly updated to use `BlockData`.

# Test: Search for the `blockSyncReceived` method usage. Expect: Consistent usage across the codebase.
rg --type go -A 5 $'blockSyncReceived'

Length of output: 1196


513-513: Update variable type in blockGossipReceived.

The variable gossipedBlock has been updated to BlockData. Ensure that all operations within blockGossipReceived are compatible with the BlockData type and that any related documentation is updated.

@omritoptix omritoptix changed the title chore(p2p): p2pblockevent renamed refactor(p2p): rename p2p block event Aug 11, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@omritoptix omritoptix left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

changed the title.
if it's touches source code, shouldn't be a chore but refactor (if doesn't change logic).

@omritoptix omritoptix merged commit 603c160 into main Aug 12, 2024
7 checks passed
@omritoptix omritoptix deleted the srene/1005-P2PBlockEvent-rename branch August 12, 2024 09:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

P2PBlockEvent type starts with package name
2 participants