Rundeck execution follow UI splits single steps into multiple sections

[andysteady]

When a single step in a job has a lot of output, rundeck splits what should be a single step in the "annotated" view into multiple steps.

The split appears arbitrary.

A good job to try this with is to create a simple job that executes apt-get update on a debian machine as sudo. A screen shot is attached showing the follow screen of a such a job. Note in the picture that each annotation heading is for the same job step.

[gschueler]

this might be a problem capturing stderr output perhaps?

would you mind sending me the log file (.txt) from this kind of execution? thanks

[andysteady]

Do you mean the rundeck.log?

[gschueler]

No, i mean the log file for the execution, it should be in RDECK_BASE/var/logs/rundeck/PROJECT/GROUP/JOB/ID.txt , where ID is the execution ID number

[andysteady]

Ah, right - sure, I have sent this to you in a private email. Cheers.

[gschueler]

I see, it looks like the node context is not recorded for those odd lines,
which appear to be at a different log level. I think they are coming from
stderr.

So i think this bug has to do with stderr output not keeping the right Node
context information when record in the logs.

On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Andy Steady [email protected]:

Ah, right - sure, I have sent this to you in a private email. Cheers.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/347#issuecomment-16135111
.

[andysteady]

Seems logical and explains why this is also seen when doing wgets.
Its strange how common, defacto tools such as apt-get and wget seem to send some progress information to stderr.
Anyway, if possible, I would like to vote for this issue :)

[andysteady]

Hi,
Has there been any progress on this one? I'd be happy to help test it.
Cheers,
Andy

[gschueler]

Hi Andy,

I was able to reproduce the issue, but I have not had a chance to fix it

On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Andy Steady [email protected]:

Hi,
Has there been any progress on this one? I'd be happy to help test it.
Cheers,
Andy

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/347#issuecomment-17680489
.

[gschueler]

simple test script described in #195

[gschueler]

need to verify fixed in 1.6-dev