We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Currently, some programs have a different package ID for each version.
also, (not sure how these are diff from above)
duplicates?
related:
Disregarding that these are probably unnecessary duplicates, packages like:
Should definitely be consolidated into a single vs2013 package
vs2013
But from there, how to handle versions?
FOO
FOO.install
FOO.portable
--package-parameters
choco install visualstudio --params '/2013 /professional' choco install visualstudio --params '/version=2013 /release=professional'
choco install visualstudio --params '/2013 /professional'
choco install visualstudio --params '/version=2013 /release=professional'
choco install visualstudio-professional --params '/2013' choco install visualstudio-professional --params '/version=2013'
choco install visualstudio-professional --params '/2013'
choco install visualstudio-professional --params '/version=2013'
choco install visualstudio2013 --params '/professional' choco install visualstudio2013 --params '/release=professional'
choco install visualstudio2013 --params '/professional'
choco install visualstudio2013 --params '/release=professional'
Examples:
Also long-hand or short-hand for release types (if used):
Which would be best practice?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
--version
@gep13 , this seems OK in the version 0.10.5+ so i think you can close. thx
Sorry, something went wrong.
@tunisiano187 this is a good reference issue regarding duplicate packages etc, but I agree, I don't think there is anything to be done here directly.
No branches or pull requests
Currently, some programs have a different package ID for each version.
Examples of multiple packages for programs
dotnet/netfx framework packages
also, (not sure how these are diff from above)
Microsoft Visual C++ redistributables
duplicates?
Visual Studio
duplicates?
related:
Why not consolidate?
Disregarding that these are probably unnecessary duplicates, packages like:
Should definitely be consolidated into a single
vs2013
packageBut from there, how to handle versions?
Option 1 -- metapackage
FOO
/FOO.install
/FOO.portable
Option 2 -- master pkg
--package-parameters
choco install visualstudio --params '/2013 /professional'
choco install visualstudio --params '/version=2013 /release=professional'
Option 3 -- master type
--package-parameters
choco install visualstudio-professional --params '/2013'
choco install visualstudio-professional --params '/version=2013'
Option 4 -- master major version
--package-parameters
choco install visualstudio2013 --params '/professional'
choco install visualstudio2013 --params '/release=professional'
Standardize package naming
Programs
Examples:
Release type
Also long-hand or short-hand for release types (if used):
Final question (hard)
Which would be best practice?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: