Create new use case showcasing forecast equivalency #206
Labels
alert: NEED ACCOUNT KEY
Need to assign an account key to this issue
alert: NEED MORE DEFINITION
Not yet actionable, additional definition required
type: task
An actionable item of work
Describe the Task
Eric Gilleland has put together an R code that demonstrates the idea of testing whether one forecast is better more often than another. This has a paper currently in development to support the findings, but the code itself is tried and true.
It should be noted that the equation holds up so long as the categories are independent, which assumed with contingency table statistics.
powerdiverger.R.txt
Time Estimate
Estimate the amount of work required here.
Issues should represent approximately 1 to 3 days of work.
Sub-Issues
Consider breaking the task down into sub-issues.
Relevant Deadlines
List relevant project deadlines here or state NONE.
Funding Source
Define the source of funding and account keys here or state NONE.
Define the Metadata
Assignee
Labels
Projects and Milestone
Define Related Issue(s)
Consider the impact to the other METplus components.
Task Checklist
See the METplus Workflow for details.
Branch name:
feature_<Issue Number>_<Description>
Pull request:
feature <Issue Number> <Description>
Select: Reviewer(s) and Linked issues
Select: Repository level development cycle Project for the next official release
Select: Milestone as the next official version
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: