-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Drush should add an extra confirmation step when installing experimental modules #2770
Comments
I support that issue on drupal.org. As for Drush, I'm a bit resistant to nanny-nags. Mhess wants a confirm when you enable a module that hasn't yet opted into security team coverage. Drush is not your vehicle for disclaimers and CYA! |
If you pass |
That's the thing. Passing From a UX standpoint the following is probably not great, but I'd rather see an experimental module installed only when a special parameter is invoked with E.g.
|
But isn't that what
|
It sure is. I guess I'm just trying to help people make an educated choice based on the special status of experimental modules when they have to make an important decision like installing a module. |
An extra non-confirmed warning message is sufficient here. Folks can always un-install the module if they did not realize in advance that it was experimental. |
FYI confirmation is no longer needed when enabling a module unless more dependencies need to be also enabled. Same for uninstall. As of Drush9. |
Drupal core can add a nag if it wants to. |
Current state:
Sample expected state:
See https://www.drupal.org/node/2880374 for background.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: