Learn to program in ODS' Online Dev School program where we train new web developers in today's hottest technologies like HTML5, CSS3, Javascript/E6 and Ruby!
- Source Code Layout
- Syntax
- Naming
- Comments
- Annotations
- Classes
- Exceptions
- Collections
- Strings
- Regular Expressions
- Percent Literals
- Metaprogramming
- Misc
Nearly everybody is convinced that every style but their own is ugly and unreadable. Leave out the "but their own" and they're probably right...
-- Jerry Coffin (on indentation)
-
Use
UTF-8
as the source file encoding. -
Use two spaces per indentation level.
# good def some_method do_something end # bad - four spaces def some_method do_something end
-
Use Unix-style line endings. (*BSD/Solaris/Linux/OSX users are covered by default, Windows users have to be extra careful.)
-
If you're using Git you might want to add the following configuration setting to protect your project from Windows line endings creeping in:
$ git config --global core.autocrlf true
-
-
Use spaces around operators, after commas, colons and semicolons, around
{
and before}
. Whitespace might be (mostly) irrelevant to the Ruby interpreter, but its proper use is the key to writing easily readable code.sum = 1 + 2 a, b = 1, 2 1 > 2 ? true : false; puts 'Hi' [1, 2, 3].each { |e| puts e }
The only exception is when using the exponent operator:
# bad e = M * c ** 2 # good e = M * c**2
-
No spaces after
(
,[
or before]
,)
.some(arg).other [1, 2, 3].length
-
Indent
when
as deep ascase
. I know that many would disagree with this one, but it's the style established in both the "The Ruby Programming Language" and "Programming Ruby".case when song.name == 'Misty' puts 'Not again!' when song.duration > 120 puts 'Too long!' when Time.now.hour > 21 puts "It's too late" else song.play end kind = case year when 1850..1889 then 'Blues' when 1890..1909 then 'Ragtime' when 1910..1929 then 'New Orleans Jazz' when 1930..1939 then 'Swing' when 1940..1950 then 'Bebop' else 'Jazz' end
-
Use empty lines between
def
s and to break up a method into logical paragraphs.def some_method data = initialize(options) data.manipulate! data.result end def some_method result end
-
Align the parameters of a method call if they span over multiple lines.
# starting point (line is too long) def send_mail(source) Mailer.deliver(to: '[email protected]', from: '[email protected]', subject: 'Important message', body: source.text) end # bad (normal indent) def send_mail(source) Mailer.deliver( to: '[email protected]', from: '[email protected]', subject: 'Important message', body: source.text) end # bad (double indent) def send_mail(source) Mailer.deliver( to: '[email protected]', from: '[email protected]', subject: 'Important message', body: source.text) end # good def send_mail(source) Mailer.deliver(to: '[email protected]', from: '[email protected]', subject: 'Important message', body: source.text) end
-
Use RDoc and its conventions for API documentation. Don't put an empty line between the comment block and the
def
. -
Keep lines fewer than 80 characters.
-
Avoid trailing whitespace.
-
Use
def
with parentheses when there are arguments. Omit the parentheses when the method doesn't accept any arguments.def some_method # body omitted end def some_method_with_arguments(arg1, arg2) # body omitted end
-
Never use
for
, unless you know exactly why. Most of the time iterators should be used instead.for
is implemented in terms ofeach
(so you're adding a level of indirection), but with a twist -for
doesn't introduce a new scope (unlikeeach
) and variables defined in its block will be visible outside it.arr = [1, 2, 3] # bad for elem in arr do puts elem end # good arr.each { |elem| puts elem }
-
Never use
then
for multi-lineif/unless
.# bad if some_condition then # body omitted end # good if some_condition # body omitted end
-
Favor the ternary operator(
?:
) overif/then/else/end
constructs. It's more common and obviously more concise.# bad result = if some_condition then something else something_else end # good result = some_condition ? something : something_else
-
Use one expression per branch in a ternary operator. This also means that ternary operators must not be nested. Prefer
if/else
constructs in these cases.# bad some_condition ? (nested_condition ? nested_something : nested_something_else) : something_else # good if some_condition nested_condition ? nested_something : nested_something_else else something_else end
-
Never use
if x: ...
- it is removed in Ruby 1.9. Use the ternary operator instead.# bad result = if some_condition: something else something_else end # good result = some_condition ? something : something_else
-
Never use
if x; ...
. Use the ternary operator instead. -
Use
when x then ...
for one-line cases. The alternative syntaxwhen x: ...
is removed in Ruby 1.9. -
Never use
when x; ...
. See the previous rule. -
Use
&&/||
for boolean expressions,and/or
for control flow. (Rule of thumb: If you have to use outer parentheses, you are using the wrong operators.)# boolean expression if some_condition && some_other_condition do_something end # control flow document.saved? or document.save!
-
Avoid multi-line
?:
(the ternary operator), useif/unless
instead. -
Favor modifier
if/unless
usage when you have a single-line body. Another good alternative is the usage of control flowand/or
.# bad if some_condition do_something end # good do_something if some_condition # another good option some_condition and do_something
-
Favor
unless
overif
for negative conditions (or control flowor
).# bad do_something if !some_condition # good do_something unless some_condition # another good option some_condition or do_something
-
Never use
unless
withelse
. Rewrite these with the positive case first.# bad unless success? puts 'failure' else puts 'success' end # good if success? puts 'success' else puts 'failure' end
-
Never have an
if
statement with anelsif
that does not include anelse
# bad puts if is_temp?(file) 'temp' elsif is_perm?(file) 'perm' end # good puts if is_temp?(file) 'temp' elsif is_perm?(file) 'perm' else raise 'FileType not supported' end
-
Never have an
case
statement that does not include anelse
# bad kind = case year when 1850..1889 then 'Blues' when 1890..1909 then 'Ragtime' when 1910..1929 then 'New Orleans Jazz' when 1930..1939 then 'Swing' when 1940..1950 then 'Bebop' end # good kind = case year when 1850..1889 then 'Blues' when 1890..1909 then 'Ragtime' when 1910..1929 then 'New Orleans Jazz' when 1930..1939 then 'Swing' when 1940..1950 then 'Bebop' else raise 'Year in music not accounted for' end
-
Don't use parentheses around the condition of an
if/unless/while
, unless the condition contains an assignment (see "Using the return value of=
" below).# bad if (x > 10) # body omitted end # good if x > 10 # body omitted end # ok if (x = self.next_value) # body omitted end
-
Favor modifier
while/until
usage when you have a single-line body.# bad while some_condition do_something end # good do_something while some_condition
-
Favor
until
overwhile
for negative conditions.# bad do_something while !some_condition # good do_something until some_condition
-
Omit parentheses around parameters for methods that are part of an internal DSL (e.g. Rake, Rails, RSpec), methods that are with "keyword" status in Ruby (e.g.
attr_reader
,puts
) and attribute access methods. Use parentheses around the arguments of all other method invocations.class Person attr_reader :name, :age # omitted end temperance = Person.new('Temperance', 30) temperance.name puts temperance.age x = Math.sin(y) array.delete(e)
-
Prefer
{...}
overdo...end
for single-line blocks. Avoid using{...}
for multi-line blocks (multiline chaining is always ugly). Always usedo...end
for "control flow" and "method definitions" (e.g. in Rakefiles and certain DSLs). Avoiddo...end
when chaining.names = ['Bozhidar', 'Steve', 'Sarah'] # good names.each { |name| puts name } # bad names.each do |name| puts name end # good names.select { |name| name.start_with?('S') }.map { |name| name.upcase } # bad names.select do |name| name.start_with?('S') end.map { |name| name.upcase }
Some will argue that multiline chaining would look OK with the use of {...}, but they should ask themselves - it this code really readable and can't the blocks contents be extracted into nifty methods.
-
Avoid
return
where not required.# bad def some_method(some_arr) return some_arr.size end # good def some_method(some_arr) some_arr.size end
-
Use spaces around the
=
operator when assigning default values to method parameters:# bad def some_method(arg1=:default, arg2=nil, arg3=[]) # do something... end # good def some_method(arg1 = :default, arg2 = nil, arg3 = []) # do something... end
While several Ruby books suggest the first style, the second is much more prominent in practice (and arguably a bit more readable).
-
Avoid line continuation (\) where not required. In practice, avoid using line continuations at all.
# bad result = 1 - \ 2 # good (but still ugly as hell) result = 1 \ - 2
-
Using the return value of
=
(an assignment) is ok, but surround the assignment with parenthesis.# good - shows intented use of assignment if (v = array.grep(/foo/)) ... # bad if v = array.grep(/foo/) ... # also good - shows intended use of assignment and has correct precedence. if (v = self.next_value) == 'hello' ...
-
Use
||=
freely to initialize variables.# set name to Bozhidar, only if it's nil or false name ||= 'Bozhidar'
-
Don't use
||=
to initialize boolean variables. (Consider what would happen if the current value happened to befalse
.)# bad - would set enabled to true even if it was false enabled ||= true # good enabled = true if enabled.nil?
-
Avoid using Perl-style special variables (like
$0-9
, `$``, etc. ). They are quite cryptic and their use in anything but one-liner scripts is discouraged. -
Never put a space between a method name and the opening parenthesis.
# bad f (3 + 2) + 1 # good f(3 + 2) + 1
-
If the first argument to a method begins with an open parenthesis, always use parentheses in the method invocation. For example, write
f((3 + 2) + 1)
. -
Always run the Ruby interpreter with the
-w
option so it will warn you if you forget either of the rules above! -
When the keys of your hash are symbols use the Ruby 1.9 hash literal syntax.
# bad hash = { :one => 1, :two => 2 } # good hash = { one: 1, two: 2 }
-
Use the new lambda literal syntax.
# bad lambda = lambda { |a, b| a + b } lambda.call(1, 2) # good lambda = ->(a, b) { a + b } lambda.(1, 2)
-
Use
_
for unused block parameters.# bad result = hash.map { |k, v| v + 1 } # good result = hash.map { |_, v| v + 1 }
The only real difficulties in programming are cache invalidation and naming things.
-- Phil Karlton
-
Use
snake_case
for methods and variables. -
Use
CamelCase
for classes and modules. (Keep acronyms like HTTP, RFC, XML uppercase.) -
Use
SCREAMING_SNAKE_CASE
for other constants. -
The names of predicate methods (methods that return a boolean value) should end in a question mark. (i.e.
Array#empty?
). -
The names of potentially "dangerous" methods (i.e. methods that modify
self
or the arguments,exit!
(doesn't run the finalizers likeexit
does), etc.) should end with an exclamation mark if there exists a safe version of that dangerous method.# bad - there is not matching 'safe' method class Person def update! end end # good class Person def update end end # good class Person def update! end def update end end
-
Define the non-bang (safe) method in terms of the bang (dangerous) one if possible.
class Array def flatten_once! res = [] each do |e| [*e].each { |f| res << f } end replace(res) end def flatten_once dup.flatten_once! end end
-
When using
reduce
with short blocks, name the arguments|a, e|
(accumulator, element). -
When defining binary operators, name the argument
other
.def +(other) # body omitted end
-
Prefer
map
overcollect
,find
overdetect
,select
overfind_all
,reduce
overinject
andsize
overlength
. This is not a hard requirement; if the use of the alias enhances readability, it's ok to use it. The rhyming methods are inherited from Smalltalk and are not common in other programming languages. The reason the use ofselect
is encouraged overfind_all
is that it goes together nicely withreject
and its name is pretty self-explanatory.
Good code is its own best documentation. As you're about to add a comment, ask yourself, "How can I improve the code so that this comment isn't needed?" Improve the code and then document it to make it even clearer.
-- Steve McConnell
-
Write self-documenting code and ignore the rest of this section. Seriously!
-
Comments longer than a word are capitalized and use punctuation. Use one space after periods.
-
Avoid superfluous comments.
# bad counter += 1 # increments counter by one
-
Keep existing comments up-to-date. An outdated is worse than no comment at all.
Good code is like a good joke - it needs no explanation.
-- Russ Olsen
- Avoid writing comments to explain bad code. Refactor the code to make it self-explanatory. (Do or do not - there is no try. --Yoda)
-
Annotations should usually be written on the line immediately above the relevant code.
-
The annotation keyword is followed by a colon and a space, then a note describing the problem.
-
If multiple lines are required to describe the problem, subsequent lines should be indented two spaces after the
#
.def bar # FIXME: This has crashed occasionally since v3.2.1. It may # be related to the BarBazUtil upgrade. baz(:quux) end
-
In cases where the problem is so obvious that any documentation would be redundant, annotations may be left at the end of the offending line with no note. This usage should be the exception and not the rule.
def bar sleep 100 # OPTIMIZE end
-
Use
TODO
to note missing features or functionality that should be added at a later date. -
Use
FIXME
to note broken code that needs to be fixed. -
Use
OPTIMIZE
to note slow or inefficient code that may cause performance problems. -
Use
HACK
to note code smells where questionable coding practices were used and should be refactored away. -
Use
REVIEW
to note anything that should be looked at to confirm it is working as intended. For example:REVIEW: Are we sure this is how the client does X currently?
-
Use other custom annotation keywords if it feels appropriate, but be sure to document them in your project's
README
or similar.
-
When designing class hierarchies make sure that they conform to the Liskov Substitution Principle.
-
Try to make your classes as [SOLID](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SOLID_(object-oriented_design\)) as possible.
-
Always supply a proper
to_s
method for classes that represent domain objects.class Person attr_reader :first_name, :last_name def initialize(first_name, last_name) @first_name = first_name @last_name = last_name end def to_s "#@first_name #@last_name" end end
-
Use the
attr
family of functions to define trivial accessors or mutators.# bad class Person def initialize(first_name, last_name) @first_name = first_name @last_name = last_name end def first_name @first_name end def last_name @last_name end end # good class Person attr_reader :first_name, :last_name def initialize(first_name, last_name) @first_name = first_name @last_name = last_name end end
-
Consider using
Struct.new
, which defines the trivial accessors, constructor and comparison operators for you.# good class Person attr_reader :first_name, :last_name def initialize(first_name, last_name) @first_name = first_name @last_name = last_name end end # better class Person < Struct.new(:first_name, :last_name) end
-
Consider adding factory methods to provide additional sensible ways to create instances of a particular class.
class Person def self.create(options_hash) # body omitted end end
-
Prefer duck-typing over inheritance.
# bad class Animal # abstract method def speak end end # extend superclass class Duck < Animal def speak puts 'Quack! Quack' end end # extend superclass class Dog < Animal def speak puts 'Bau! Bau!' end end # good class Duck def speak puts 'Quack! Quack' end end class Dog def speak puts 'Bau! Bau!' end end
-
Avoid the usage of class (
@@
) variables due to their "nasty" behavior in inheritance.class Parent @@class_var = 'parent' def self.print_class_var puts @@class_var end end class Child < Parent @@class_var = 'child' end Parent.print_class_var # => will print "child"
As you can see all the classes in a class hierarchy actually share one class variable. Class instance variables should usually be preferred over class variables.
-
Assign proper visibility levels to methods (
private
,protected
) in accordance with their intended usage. Don't go off leaving everythingpublic
(which is the default). After all we're coding in Ruby now, not in Python. -
Indent the
public
,protected
, andprivate
methods as much the method definitions they apply to. Leave one blank line above them.class SomeClass def public_method # ... end private def private_method # ... end end
-
Use
def self.method
to define singleton methods. This makes the methods more resistant to refactoring changes.class TestClass # bad def TestClass.some_method # body omitted end # good def self.some_other_method # body omitted end # Also possible and convenient when you # have to define many singleton methods. class << self def first_method # body omitted end def second_method_etc # body omitted end end end
-
Signal exceptions using the
fail
keyword. Useraise
only when catching an exception and re-raising it (because here you're not failing, but explicitly and purposefully raising an exception).begin fail 'Oops'; rescue => error raise if error.message != 'Oops' end
-
Never return form an
ensure
block. If you explicitly return from a method inside anensure
block, the return will take precedence over any exception being raised, and the method will return as if no exception had been raised at all. In effect, the exception will be silently thrown away.def foo begin fail ensure return 'very bad idea' end end
-
Use implicit begin blocks when possible.
# bad def foo begin # main logic goes here rescue # failure handling goes here end end # good def foo # main logic goes here rescue # failure handling goes here end
-
Mitigate the proliferation of
begin
blocks via the use of contingency methods (a term coined by Avdi Grimm).# bad begin something_that_might_fail rescue IOError # handle IOError end begin something_else_that_might_fail rescue IOError # handle IOError end # good def with_io_error_handling yield rescue # handle IOError end with_io_error_handling { something_that_might_fail } with_io_error_handling { something_else_that_might_fail }
-
Don't suppress exceptions.
# bad begin # an exception occurs here rescue SomeError # the rescue clause does absolutely nothing end # bad do_something rescue nil
-
Don't use exceptions for flow of control.
# bad begin n / d rescue ZeroDivisionError puts 'Cannot divide by 0!' end # good if d.zero? puts 'Cannot divide by 0!' else n / d end
-
Avoid rescuing the
Exception
class. This will trap signals and calls toexit
, requiring you tokill -9
the process.# bad begin # calls to exit and kill signals will be caught (except kill -9) exit rescue Exception puts "you didn't really want to exit, right?" # exception handling end # good begin # a blind rescue rescues from StandardError, not Exception as many # programmers assume. rescue => e # exception handling end # also good begin # an exception occurs here rescue StandardError => e # exception handling end
-
Put more specific exceptions higher up the rescue chain, otherwise they'll never be rescued from.
# bad begin # some code rescue Exception => e # some handling rescue StandardError => e # some handling end # good begin # some code rescue StandardError => e # some handling rescue Exception => e # some handling end
-
Release external resources obtained by your program in an ensure block.
f = File.open('testfile') begin # .. process rescue # .. handle error ensure f.close unless f.nil? end
-
Favor the use of exceptions for the standard library over introducing new exception classes.
-
Prefer literal array and hash creation notation (unless you need to pass parameters to their constructors, that is).
# bad arr = Array.new hash = Hash.new # good arr = [] hash = {}
-
Prefer
%w
to the literal array syntax when you need an array of strings.# bad STATES = ['draft', 'open', 'closed'] # good STATES = %w(draft open closed)
-
Avoid the creation of huge gaps in arrays.
arr = [] arr[100] = 1 # now you have an array with lots of nils
-
Use
Set
instead ofArray
when dealing with unique elements.Set
implements a collection of unordered values with no duplicates. This is a hybrid ofArray
's intuitive inter-operation facilities andHash
's fast lookup. -
Use symbols instead of strings as hash keys.
# bad hash = { 'one' => 1, 'two' => 2, 'three' => 3 } # good hash = { one: 1, two: 2, three: 3 }
-
Avoid the use of mutable object as hash keys.
-
Use the new 1.9 literal hash syntax in preference to the hashrocket syntax.
# bad hash = { :one => 1, :two => 2, :three => 3 } # good hash = { one: 1, two: 2, three: 3 }
-
Rely on the fact that hashes in 1.9 are ordered.
-
Never modify a collection while traversing it.
-
Prefer string interpolation instead of string concatenation:
# bad email_with_name = user.name + ' <' + user.email + '>' # good email_with_name = "#{user.name} <#{user.email}>"
-
Consider padding string interpolation code with space. It more clearly sets the code apart from the string.
"#{ user.last_name }, #{ user.first_name }"
-
Prefer single-quoted strings when you don't need string interpolation or special symbols such as
\t
,\n
,'
, etc.# bad name = "Bozhidar" # good name = 'Bozhidar'
-
Don't use
{}
around instance variables being interpolated into a string.class Person attr_reader :first_name, :last_name def initialize(first_name, last_name) @first_name = first_name @last_name = last_name end # bad def to_s "#{@first_name} #{@last_name}" end # good def to_s "#@first_name #@last_name" end end
-
Avoid using
String#+
when you need to construct large data chunks. Instead, useString#<<
. Concatenation mutates the string instance in-place and is always faster thanString#+
, which creates a bunch of new string objects.# good and also fast html = '' html << '<h1>Page title</h1>' paragraphs.each do |paragraph| html << "<p>#{paragraph}</p>" end
-
Don't use regular expressions if you just need plain text search in string:
string['text']
-
For simple constructions you can use regexp directly through string index.
match = string[/regexp/] # get content of matched regexp first_group = string[/text(grp)/, 1] # get content of captured group string[/text (grp)/, 1] = 'replace' # string => 'text replace'
-
Use non capturing groups when you don't use captured result of parenthesis.
/(first|second)/ # bad /(?:first|second)/ # good
-
Avoid using $1-9 as it can be hard to track what they contain. Named groups can be used instead.
# bad /(regexp)/ =~ string ... process $1 # good /(?<meaningful_var>regexp)/ =~ string ... process meaningful_var
-
Character classes have only few special characters you should care about:
^
,-
,\
,]
, so don't escape.
or brackets in[]
. -
Be careful with
^
and$
as they match start/end of line, not string endings. If you want to match the whole string use:\A
and\z
(not to be confused with\Z
which is the equivalent of/\n?\z/
).string = "some injection\nusername" string[/^username$/] # matches string[/\Ausername\z/] # don't match
-
Use
x
modifier for complex regexps. This makes them more readable and you can add some useful comments. Just be careful as spaces are ignored.regexp = %r{ start # some text \s # white space char (group) # first group (?:alt1|alt2) # some alternation end }x
-
For complex replacements
sub
/gsub
can be used with block or hash.
-
Use
%w
freely.STATES = %w(draft open closed)
-
Use
%()
for single-line strings which require both interpolation and embedded double-quotes. For multi-line strings, prefer heredocs.# bad (no interpolation needed) %(<div class="text">Some text</div>) # should be '<div class="text">Some text</div>' # bad (no double-quotes) %(This is #{quality} style) # should be "This is #{quality} style" # bad (multiple lines) %(<div>\n<span class="big">#{exclamation}</span>\n</div>) # should be a heredoc. # good (requires interpolation, has quotes, single line) %(<tr><td class="name">#{name}</td>)
-
Use
%r
only for regular expressions matching more than one '/' character.# bad %r(\s+) # still bad %r(^/(.*)$) # should be /^\/(.*)$/ # good %r(^/blog/2011/(.*)$)
-
Avoid
%q
,%Q
,%x
,%s
, and%W
. -
Prefer
()
as delimiters for all%
literals.
-
Do not mess around in core classes when writing LIBRARIES. (Do not monkey patch them.)
-
When writing your APPLICATION, extend core classes freely, but do so with documentation and the principle of least surprise.
-
The block form of
class_eval
is preferable to the string-interpolated form.-
when you use the string-interpolated form, always supply
__FILE__
and__LINE__
, so that your backtraces make sense:class_eval 'def use_relative_model_naming?; true; end', __FILE__, __LINE__
-
define_method
is preferable toclass_eval{ def ... }
-
-
When using
class_eval
(or othereval
) with string interpolation, add a comment block showing its appearance if interpolated (a practice I learned from the rails code):# from activesupport/lib/active_support/core_ext/string/output_safety.rb UNSAFE_STRING_METHODS.each do |unsafe_method| if 'String'.respond_to?(unsafe_method) class_eval <<-EOT, __FILE__, __LINE__ + 1 def #{unsafe_method}(*args, &block) # def capitalize(*args, &block) to_str.#{unsafe_method}(*args, &block) # to_str.capitalize(*args, &block) end # end def #{unsafe_method}!(*args) # def capitalize!(*args) @dirty = true # @dirty = true super # super end # end EOT end end
-
avoid using
method_missing
for metaprogramming. Backtraces become messy; the behavior is not listed in#methods
; misspelled method calls might silently work (nukes.launch_state = false
). Consider using delegation, proxy, ordefine_method
instead. If you must, usemethod_missing
,-
be sure to also define
respond_to?
-
only catch methods with a well-defined prefix, such as
find_by_*
-- make your code as assertive as possible. -
call
super
at the end of your statement -
delegate to assertive, non-magical methods:
# bad def method_missing?(meth, *args, &block) if /^find_by_(?<prop>.*)/ =~ meth # ... lots of code to do a find_by else super end end # good def method_missing?(meth, *args, &block) if /^find_by_(?<prop>.*)/ =~ meth find_by(prop, *args, &block) else super end end # best of all, though, would to define_method as each findable attribute is declared
-
-
Write
ruby -w
safe code. -
Avoid hashes as optional parameters. Does the method do too much?
-
Avoid methods longer than 10 LOC (lines of code). Ideally, most methods will be shorter than 5 LOC. Empty lines do not contribute to the relevant LOC.
-
Avoid parameter lists longer than three or four parameters.
-
If you really have to, add "global" methods to Kernel and make them private.
-
Use class instance variables instead of global variables.
#bad $foo_bar = 1 #good class Foo class << self attr_accessor :bar end end Foo.bar = 1
-
Avoid
alias
whenalias_method
will do. -
Use
OptionParser
for parsing complex command line options andruby -s
for trivial command line options. -
Code in a functional way, avoiding mutation when that makes sense.
-
Avoid needless metaprogramming, use it for better organized code.
-
Do not mutate arguments unless that is the purpose of the method.
-
Avoid more than three levels of block nesting.
-
Be consistent. In an ideal world, be consistent with these guidelines.
-
Use common sense.