Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Find the relation between a program/station and the systemdata. #151

Closed
fleibede opened this issue Apr 21, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

Find the relation between a program/station and the systemdata. #151

fleibede opened this issue Apr 21, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@fleibede
Copy link
Contributor

This is a question or request rather than an issue.

Is there any way to find out which SDB folder that belongs to each CPU?
This is mostly relevant if you have a project with multiple stations.

Through the hOmSave7/s7hk31ax/HRELATI1.dbf you get the CPUFolders and can link it to the program folders.

The compiled system-datablocks are stored in the sdb/"ID"/ folder, and a list of the folders' ID-number can be found in sdb/S0112001.dbf (hex values). How can this ID be linked to the CPUfolder/program-folder structure?

I have been looking for quite a while to find a tangible connection, but so far been out of luck.
I appreciate any suggestions.

One possible solution that is not ideal, is to search through all .PG files in each sdb folder for the MLFB of the station, and identify the relation through that. It appears the CPU MLFB is present as ASCII in at least one of the .PG files for most projects. The MLFB can be found via this fd41ede commit that i will create a PR with soon.

@jogibear9988
Copy link
Member

maybe you could ask Thomas_V2.1 from sps-forum.de
He knows many of such details.

From him I also got this:

@dotnetprojects dotnetprojects locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 15, 2021

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants