Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Arm64 encodings for SVE IF_SVE_CX_4A_A to IF_SVE_HT_4A group #96214
Add Arm64 encodings for SVE IF_SVE_CX_4A_A to IF_SVE_HT_4A group #96214
Changes from 6 commits
3ef3af4
ccbfdb8
0548526
4662492
a93f47e
1756c12
399133e
a3827cd
b427187
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While passing
INS_OPTS_SCALABLE_D
looks fine for this instruction format, I was checking other formats where we directly pass the INS_OPTS and seems like forIF_SVE_EQ_3A
, we should have a method that is reverse ofoptWidenSveElemsizeArrangement()
, which will basically lowerH->B
,S->H
andD->S
instead of manipulating theidOpts()
this way.runtime/src/coreclr/jit/emitarm64.cpp
Lines 18752 to 18755 in b498582
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure, makes sense. I will piggyback this change on my next patch 👍