Rocky Linux support #59178
Rocky Linux support #59178
Conversation
ghost
added
the
community-contribution
|
Tagging subscribers to this area: @Anipik, @safern, @ViktorHofer Issue DetailsAdd Rocky Linux support Changes based on those necessary for Rocky Linux downstream rebuild of RHEL source packages for dotnet 3.1 and dotnet 5.0.
|
|
|
| <RuntimeGroup Include="rocky"> | ||
| <Parent>rhel</Parent> | ||
| <Architectures>x64;arm64</Architectures> | ||
| <Versions>8;8.4;9</Versions> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is there significance to 8.4? Seems like the build is compelling the parent is missing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
My experience with RHEL is that we really want to avoid adding minors here. There's going to be a Rocky/RHEL 8.x release every 6 months or so. (It's tiring enough on Fedora where there's a major bump every 6 months.) It was entirely unnecessary for RHEL 8.4, and I think we should do the same for Rocky.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for pointing this out. I wasn't entirely sure of the significance of including the minor version, either. I merged the original Rocky Linux patches and one had 8 and the other 8.4, IIRC. If you see no reason to have the minor version listed, I can remove it from the PR.
|
@wfurt For compat, ideally, we should treat Rocky same way we treat CentOS. |
|
Is there anything else necessary before this PR can be merged? Thanks! |
ghost
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
danmoseley
added
area-Meta
area-Host
and removed
area-Infrastructure-libraries
area-Meta
labels
Add Rocky Linux support
Changes based on those necessary for Rocky Linux downstream rebuild of RHEL source packages for dotnet 3.1 and dotnet 5.0.