-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
don't run LongModuleFileNamesAreSupported test on x86 #57471
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
80392a9
don't run LongModuleFileNamesAreSupported test on x86 (for some reaso…
adamsitnik 97c2857
apply code review suggestion
adamsitnik ee99091
ensure type called "Interop" has no namespace, so Interop files from …
adamsitnik 14c02bc
try JanK suggestion and use LoadLibrary instead of Assembly.LoadFile
adamsitnik 487748d
don't try to check module file path if we can't load the module itsel…
adamsitnik File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@JeremyKuhne do you perhaps know about any long path issues specific to x86?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can you explain what do you mean by flaky? what's happening? I'd expect this to be deterministic
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should this be
!(Is32Bit && !IsArm)
- perhaps we should add IsX86 in the PlatformDetection - we should also open the issue to try to understand why this is failing on x86 I think (unless we don't care for some reason).Alternative:
RuntimeInformation.ProcessArchitecture != Architecture.X86
- you should still consider adding that to platform detectionThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My guess is that it's rather related to assembly loading on x86 or process modules information not being refreshed rather than long paths itself.
It's not ;( All tests have passed in #57335 where I've re-enabled this test but it fails from time to time: #57452.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Perhaps we should add more diagnostics.. I.e. print all module list, enumerate modules in the assembly returned by Assembly.LoadFile. This sound rather sketchy as is - perhaps it's unrelated issue completely but we should at least understand why it's happening before we disable I think
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
done
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The only issues I've ever seen are bugs with the WOW layer when running an x86 binary on x64. I'm unaware of any outstanding issues though.