Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Perf] Linux/arm64: SciMark2.kernel Regression on 10/15/2024 8:19:02 AM #108980

Open
performanceautofiler bot opened this issue Oct 17, 2024 · 4 comments
Open
Assignees
Labels
arch-arm64 area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI os-linux Linux OS (any supported distro) runtime-coreclr specific to the CoreCLR runtime tenet-performance Performance related issue tenet-performance-benchmarks Issue from performance benchmark
Milestone

Comments

@performanceautofiler
Copy link

Run Information

Name Value
Architecture arm64
OS ubuntu 22.04
Queue AmpereUbuntu
Baseline 4e2fe8d886e2ca8df51643b7aa69e7ee33cf2296
Compare 69dc5ec395749dc17434140881eb1414fc989c28
Diff Diff
Configs CompilationMode:tiered, RunKind:micro

Regressions in SciMark2.kernel

Benchmark Baseline Test Test/Base Test Quality Edge Detector Baseline IR Compare IR IR Ratio
663.96 ms 717.40 ms 1.08 0.01 False

graph
Test Report

Repro

General Docs link: https://github.com/dotnet/performance/blob/main/docs/benchmarking-workflow-dotnet-runtime.md

git clone https://github.com/dotnet/performance.git
python3 .\performance\scripts\benchmarks_ci.py -f net8.0 --filter 'SciMark2.kernel*'

SciMark2.kernel.benchmarkLU

ETL Files

Histogram

JIT Disasms

Docs

Profiling workflow for dotnet/runtime repository
Benchmarking workflow for dotnet/runtime repository

@performanceautofiler performanceautofiler bot added arch-arm64 os-linux Linux OS (any supported distro) runtime-coreclr specific to the CoreCLR runtime untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner labels Oct 17, 2024
@LoopedBard3 LoopedBard3 transferred this issue from dotnet/perf-autofiling-issues Oct 17, 2024
@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Oct 17, 2024
@LoopedBard3 LoopedBard3 changed the title [Perf] Linux/arm64: 1 Regression on 10/15/2024 8:19:02 AM [Perf] Linux/arm64: SciMark2.kernel Regression on 10/15/2024 8:19:02 AM Oct 17, 2024
@LoopedBard3
Copy link
Member

LoopedBard3 commented Oct 17, 2024

Likely caused by #108771. @AndyAyersMS

Compare range: 0212c3d...8ef27e2

@LoopedBard3 LoopedBard3 added tenet-performance Performance related issue tenet-performance-benchmarks Issue from performance benchmark labels Oct 17, 2024
@AndyAyersMS
Copy link
Member

Going to wait for x64 results (we previewed and they looked like a mixed bag).

May want to up the limit, but before I do that I'll dig in and see what lead to the regression.

@jeffschwMSFT jeffschwMSFT added the area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI label Oct 18, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT, @jakobbotsch
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@AndyAyersMS
Copy link
Member

ADX shows it's mainly ARM that is impacted (one might guess because there are more registers...?)

Image

@JulieLeeMSFT JulieLeeMSFT removed the untriaged New issue has not been triaged by the area owner label Oct 22, 2024
@JulieLeeMSFT JulieLeeMSFT added this to the 10.0.0 milestone Oct 22, 2024
@vcsjones vcsjones removed the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Oct 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
arch-arm64 area-CodeGen-coreclr CLR JIT compiler in src/coreclr/src/jit and related components such as SuperPMI os-linux Linux OS (any supported distro) runtime-coreclr specific to the CoreCLR runtime tenet-performance Performance related issue tenet-performance-benchmarks Issue from performance benchmark
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants