Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is the dependency on re-linq going away? #17397

Closed
IanKemp opened this issue Aug 23, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

Is the dependency on re-linq going away? #17397

IanKemp opened this issue Aug 23, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels
closed-no-further-action The issue is closed and no further action is planned. customer-reported

Comments

@IanKemp
Copy link

IanKemp commented Aug 23, 2019

  • The package page refers to a now-defunct CodePlex site, the package has no .NET Standard 2.0 target, and no new version of the package has been published since February last year.
  • The repo has had no commits in over a year.
  • The issue board has had no activity since January.

tl;dr it looks like re-linq is a dead project.

Having a dependency on a dead project is a significant risk, especially for a widely-used and heavily depended on project like EF Core. Are there any plans to remove this dependency going forward?

@tuespetre
Copy link
Contributor

tuespetre commented Aug 23, 2019

@IanKemp yes, the team has been working to rebuild the entire query compiler from the ground up for 3.0. Can't wait to see their 3.0 release 😄

@ajcvickers
Copy link
Contributor

@IanKemp See #12795 (comment)

@ajcvickers ajcvickers added the closed-no-further-action The issue is closed and no further action is planned. label Aug 23, 2019
@ajcvickers ajcvickers reopened this Oct 16, 2022
@ajcvickers ajcvickers closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Oct 16, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
closed-no-further-action The issue is closed and no further action is planned. customer-reported
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants