Replies: 1 comment
-
I've had another thought over this, whilst cooking, and now have a better way of working that gives me the faster turnaround I am after; I still feel there should be a better way though.
I hope this makes sense... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi all, we've made extensive use of
apollo client:codegen
to generate our types that migrating them to using the types generated bygraphql-codegen
was just too much manual workI've managed to create a rudimentary spike that shows that what I want to do is feasible(ish) ie
we used to generate
but using the
typescript
+typescript-operations
plugins (and thenear-operation-file
preset) + our codegen plugin we getand all is well (ie nothing sulks).
But I am finding testing it against our codebase quite difficult as I keep getting this error when I use yarn link to connect the development space of the plugin to the node_modules of our main application (from where I execute the codegen against some real code and not just tests)
I've checked that I only have one flavour of graphql in either repository and it is the same. Any hints or tips on how I can dev/debug this issue?
I am using the workaround as mentioned here but is a bit laborious and I wondered if the advice has since changed
#5779
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions