Consider a more permissive license

[TheButlah]

Hi, I was hoping to use this in my MIT licensed project, but unfortunately the LGPL license would cause me to have to license the final binary I distribute as LGPL, if I statically link. Would you consider adopting a license that doesn't force other projects to use the same license/is non-viral?

One approach you could consider is dual licensing as MIT and Apache 2.0, just like rustc itself and most of the rest of the rust ecosystem.

[1313]

Sure sounds reasonable 👍

[1313]

Closed with #7