You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was starting a follow up on #49 to remove any Joda-Time dependency from this project, as "from Java SE 8 onwards, users are asked to migrate to java.time (JSR-310) - a core part of the JDK which replaces this project" (Joda-Time Home) and this library targets "JavaFX 8, 9, 10, and 11".
When looking at CalendarFXRecurrence, I wondered if the whole module could be replaced by the recurrence API of iCal4j. iCal4j implements RFC5545 (Supersedes RFC2445). It is already in the dependency tree as dependency of CalendarFXiCal and will adapt java.time (JSR-310) in the future (see ical4j/ical4j#242).
What do you think about that?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
That sounds like a very good idea. However I am not sure how big the impact will be on the public API of CalendarFX. If it is also possible to express the entire recurrence via a single string ("rrule" on Entry) then this would be great.
I was starting a follow up on #49 to remove any Joda-Time dependency from this project, as "from Java SE 8 onwards, users are asked to migrate to java.time (JSR-310) - a core part of the JDK which replaces this project" (Joda-Time Home) and this library targets "JavaFX 8, 9, 10, and 11".
When looking at
CalendarFXRecurrence
, I wondered if the whole module could be replaced by the recurrence API of iCal4j. iCal4j implements RFC5545 (Supersedes RFC2445). It is already in the dependency tree as dependency ofCalendarFXiCal
and will adapt java.time (JSR-310) in the future (see ical4j/ical4j#242).What do you think about that?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: