Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Application] Confirm with STMAS that application form is ready #629

Closed
michael-markl opened this issue Nov 13, 2022 · 7 comments · Fixed by #809
Closed

[Application] Confirm with STMAS that application form is ready #629

michael-markl opened this issue Nov 13, 2022 · 7 comments · Fixed by #809
Assignees
Labels
prio: high Issue must be solved within the next weeks. Task
Milestone

Comments

@michael-markl
Copy link
Member

Once we have a first idea how the application form looks like (and the ping-pong with the organization is implemented in a first draft version), ask the STMAS for changes and feedback.

Blocked by #628 and #627 .

@michael-markl michael-markl added Task blocked Task or user story can not be continued at the moment prio: high Issue must be solved within the next weeks. labels Nov 13, 2022
@michael-markl michael-markl added this to the Applications milestone Nov 13, 2022
@michael-markl michael-markl self-assigned this Nov 22, 2022
@dkehne
Copy link

dkehne commented Jan 16, 2023

  • We need one more field "Adresszusatz" which is not manditory. In case of sending the PDF document printed as a letter, it might me needed.
  • telephone number shouldn't be mandatory.
  • label adjustment "Die Kontaktperson hat der Weitergabe seiner Daten zum Zwecke der Antragsverarbeitung zugestimmt." to "Die Kontaktperson hat der Weitergabe seiner Daten zum Zwecke der Antragsverarbeitung zugestimmt und darf zur Überprüfung kontaktiert werden."
  • Angaben zur Organisation: Not mandatory: Land (Volunteering abroad is also valid i guess). This field should be filled per default with "Deutschland"
  • Nice to have: Tätig seit *: Can this date picker easiley be adjusted to month+year only instead of exact day?
  • label adjustment: "Hängen Sie hier bitte einen eingescannten oder abfotografierten Tätigkeitsnachweis an. Die Datei darf maximal 5 MB groß sein und muss im JPG, PNG oder PDF Format sein." to "Falls vorhanden: hängen Sie hier bitte einen eingescannten oder abfotografierten Tätigkeitsnachweis an. Die Datei darf maximal 5 MB groß sein und muss im JPG, PNG oder PDF Format sein."
  • label adjustment: "Ihr Antrag für die Ehrenamtskarte wurde erfolgreich übermittelt. Sie können das Fenster schließen." to "Über den Fortschritt Ihres Antrags werden Sie per E-Mail informiert. Sie können das Fenster jetzt schließen.". If possible technically, add sth like "Für Rückfragen zum Vorgang notieren Sie sich bitte folgende Bearbeitungs-ID [REGIONID]-XXXX"

@maxammann
Copy link
Member

maxammann commented Jan 16, 2023

Awesome, after that we can count the form as being ready and no more changes will be neccassary?

@dkehne
Copy link

dkehne commented Jan 23, 2023

This additional feedback came also in, so should be considered as well:
Card type:

  • Perhaps a small explanation would be still conceivable, concerning the difference between the two cards
  • Is it possible to take out the option of "renewal application" when selecting "golden honorary card"?

Requirements:

  • What happens if the applicant is not yet 16 years old? Shouldn't this also be asked for in the prerequisites (for the blue honorary activity card)? For example: I have reached the age of 16 and meet the following prerequisite for applying for a blue honorary activity card: * (Otherwise we would have again problems regarding data protection, because possibly data of persons are processed, who are not yet 16).
  • What do you think: Should the Bavarian Minister President's badge of honor also be gendered? So far, the case is quite clear, but who knows what the future will bring J Or could this be changed later?
  • There is no * in proof of activity to indicate that this is a required field. However, a file must be attached to continue.

@maxammann
Copy link
Member

We will need to filter these responses into the following two categories:

  1. Change Requests which concern things we did not understand understand initially
  2. CR which are an improvement to the app but not neccassary
  3. CR which are very minor (<30s to change)

I would say we do 1. and 3. but do 2. only after the release.
E.g. "Is it possible to take out the option of "renewal application" when selecting "golden honorary card"?" is a new task and a request for a new feature. We will do that only after the release.

I would definitely do the "label adjustments".

@michael-markl
Copy link
Member Author

michael-markl commented Feb 21, 2023

I've looked through the requested changes and fixed up the "easy ones". (#809 )

[ I implemented the requirement that we need to check that applicants are 16 or older, by checking whether the date of birth is actually at least 16 years ago. ]

What's left:

  • "Nice to have: Tätig seit *: Can this date picker easiley be adjusted to month+year only instead of exact day?"
    As this is not as easy as changing a single line, I would drop this.

  • After submitting add sth like "Für Rückfragen zum Vorgang notieren Sie sich bitte folgende Bearbeitungs-ID [REGIONID]-XXXX". I think this would be great, but is also not a (super) low-hanging fruit right now. I added this to [Applications] Add an option to "withdraw" applications for users #604 .

@michael-markl michael-markl removed the blocked Task or user story can not be continued at the moment label Feb 22, 2023
@maxammann
Copy link
Member

  • "Nice to have: Tätig seit *: Can this date picker easiley be adjusted to month+year only instead of exact day?"
    As this is not as easy as changing a single line, I would drop this.

Is there an issue for that?

@michael-markl
Copy link
Member Author

No, let's just drop the requirement. :D

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
prio: high Issue must be solved within the next weeks. Task
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants