Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Define two import pipelines #519

Closed
Tracked by #502
maxammann opened this issue Mar 1, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #533
Closed
Tracked by #502

Define two import pipelines #519

maxammann opened this issue Mar 1, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #533
Assignees
Labels
prio: high Issue must be solved within the next weeks. Task
Milestone

Comments

@maxammann
Copy link
Member

maxammann commented Mar 1, 2022

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
In #506 a pipeline name was introduced. The goal of this task is to define two pipelines:

  • lbe-bayern: exists already
  • nürnberg: does not exist yet and should be empty

Describe the solution you'd like
We already have quite a dynamic way of declaring pipelines. After this task the pipeline name configured in the backend configuration should be used.

Furthermore the backend import command should run multiple pipelines sequentially.

Describe alternatives you've considered
None

Additional context
None

@maxammann maxammann added the Task label Mar 1, 2022
@maxammann maxammann mentioned this issue Mar 1, 2022
13 tasks
@maxammann maxammann added the prio: high Issue must be solved within the next weeks. label Mar 1, 2022
@maxammann maxammann changed the title Define multiple import pipelines Define two import pipelines Mar 1, 2022
@steffenkleinle steffenkleinle self-assigned this Apr 13, 2022
@steffenkleinle steffenkleinle linked a pull request May 24, 2022 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
prio: high Issue must be solved within the next weeks. Task
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants