Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Accepting donations to fund bounty #591

Closed
LexiconCode opened this issue Jun 22, 2019 · 13 comments
Closed

Accepting donations to fund bounty #591

LexiconCode opened this issue Jun 22, 2019 · 13 comments
Assignees
Labels
Meta Everything that is not directly related Code or Documentation, e.g. GitHub, Wiki, Website, Community

Comments

@LexiconCode
Copy link
Member

LexiconCode commented Jun 22, 2019

We could open up a donation section. Then the Caster project can donate to sponsor a bounty and/or the bounties can be sponsored by individuals through https://www.bountysource.com/.

Thoughts on A few guiding principles:

  • Transparency through an automated process donations in/bounties out
  • In order for bounties to be posted they must have very clear guidelines and resources for those that wish to collect.
  • Each bounty candidate must be discussed with the community with a minimum of seven days for feedback before before the Caster project posts the bounty.
@LexiconCode LexiconCode added the Meta Everything that is not directly related Code or Documentation, e.g. GitHub, Wiki, Website, Community label Jun 22, 2019
@LexiconCode LexiconCode self-assigned this Jun 22, 2019
@kendonB
Copy link
Collaborator

kendonB commented Jun 22, 2019

Reposting: I feel strongly that the purse strings should be ultimately controlled by one individual though to prevent disputes. It should be up to that individual to ultimately judge whether a contribution is sufficiently tidy to warrant handing over the money, of course with feedback from the community. That individual should also be responsible for pricing bounties, again potentially with consultation. @LexiconCode is the obvious default person :)

@LexiconCode
Copy link
Member Author

What you think of some of the principles @kendonB?

@kendonB
Copy link
Collaborator

kendonB commented Jun 22, 2019

Totally agree

@LexiconCode
Copy link
Member Author

LexiconCode commented Jun 22, 2019

Alright so the two things we need to address for this to become reality.

  • Research if there's automated process donations in/bounties out.
  • Create guidelines for developing an issue for bounty.

@LexiconCode
Copy link
Member Author

All right have set up a dedicated email CasterVoice at protonmail c o m.

@kendonB
Copy link
Collaborator

kendonB commented Jun 24, 2019

It looks like it's quite decentralized: https://github.com/bountysource/core/wiki/Frequently-Asked-Questions

You submit bounties and interact with the site as individuals. They don't take a cut at the bounty-setting stage but they take 10% upon withdrawal, which seems a reasonable price to pay for the transparent system. Ultimately it relies on PayPal for processing in both directions.

I set up this team: https://www.bountysource.com/teams/caster-dictation/ and will add at least @LexiconCode as an admin. The team can accept donations now.

It doesn't look like it's necessary to have a caster email address.

@LexiconCode
Copy link
Member Author

Looks great. Although I don't think I've been added to the project. It's hard to tell but when I look at the members list that states your name only.

@kendonB
Copy link
Collaborator

kendonB commented Jun 24, 2019

You're there now as a full admin. @LexiconCode are you happy to take the job of making final decisions on 1) what bounties get set by the team, and 2) what solutions are good enough to get the award?

@kendonB
Copy link
Collaborator

kendonB commented Jun 24, 2019

Remember that anyone can set a bounty as an individual. It's up to that individual to decide whether a solution solves the bounty, I believe.

@LexiconCode
Copy link
Member Author

You're there now as a full admin. @LexiconCode are you happy to take the job of making final decisions on 1) what bounties get set by the team, and 2) what solutions are good enough to get the award?

Yes with feedback with the maintainers and our current community. Although I would ask that maintainers participate in reviewing solutions for rewards. It's in our best interest to make the most of the bounties rewarded.

@LexiconCode
Copy link
Member Author

LexiconCode commented Jun 24, 2019

I wonder if there is a badge we can get to put on the get homepage that were on bounty source.

edit: Looks like there's a capability of doing that I just need to figure out how to make it specific to our project

@kendonB
Copy link
Collaborator

kendonB commented Jun 24, 2019

stickers done

@LexiconCode
Copy link
Member Author

All right I'll consider this closed. If any other issues arise we can reopen.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Meta Everything that is not directly related Code or Documentation, e.g. GitHub, Wiki, Website, Community
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants