For installation or development instructions, see:
This dhall-docs
package provides a command-line utility that takes a dhall package or
file and outputs an HTML documentation of it.
dhall-docs
can analyze your Dhall package (essentially a folder with several
.dhall
files) to generate documentation. Specifically:
- Extracts documentation from each file's header comments (see Comment format).
- The generated documentation includes breadcrumbs to aid navigation.
- Create an index for each folder in your package listing the
.dhall
files in that folder alongside the "exported packages" (the contained folders). - Extracts examples from assertions.
- Extracts the type of each Dhall file from the source code and renders it in the indexes.
- Renders the source code in each Dhall file's documentation.
- Jump-to-definition on imports and let-bindings
To see a demo, visit the documentation for the
Dhall Prelude
.
You can also check the tests folder for further examples
The easiest usage is the following:
dhall-docs --input ${PACKAGE-FOLDER}
dhall-docs
will store the documentation in
${XDG_DATA_HOME}/dhall-docs/${OUTPUT-HASH}-${PACKAGE-NAME}/
, where:
$XDG_DATA_HOME
environment variable comes from the xdg specification. If it is not defined,dhall-docs
will default to~/.local/share/
.OUTPUT-HASH
is the hash of the generated documentation. This is to make the folder content-addressable. Also, it avoids overwriting the documentation folder when there was a change in the way it was generated.PACKAGE-NAME
is the package name of your documentation. By default, it will be the basename of the--input
folder, but you can override it via--package-name
.
After generating the documentation, dhall-docs
will create a symlink to the
documentation index at ./docs/index.html
. You can customize the location of
that symlink using --output-link
flag, like this:
dhall-docs --input . --output-link ${OTHER_LINK}
For more information about the tool, check the --help
flag.
Documenting your package is essentially writing comments on your source code,
although there are some format rules that these need to obey to work
properly with dhall-docs
. These rules aid dhall-docs
in extracting the text
on the documentation that will be passed to our Markdown preprocessor to finally
render your documentation in HTML.
You can see examples of writing documentation on the tests folder.
In every example we used ␣
as an alias to a whitespace character
The markup language of the documentation is CommonMark, which is a strict
Markdown flavor. dhall-docs
uses mmark
, a package that parses
CommonMark and transforms it to HTML. This package follows (almost)
that specification.
Normal block comments in Dhall starts with {-
and ends with -}
:
{- foo
bar
baz
-}
A dhall-docs
block comment needs to start with "{-|"
and a
newline. The newline can be either \n
or \r\n
. This means that the actual
documentation must starts on the following line.
CommonMark supports some features that are sensitive to indentation (e.g.
indented-code-blocks). Indentation on dhall-docs
block comments is roughly
the same to Dhall multi-line strings: the indentation is determined by the
longest common whitespace prefix between the lines on the block comment.
In all the following examples:
{-|
foo
bar
baz
-}
{-|
foo
bar
baz
-}
{-|
foo
bar
baz
-}
{-|
foo
bar
baz-}
... dhall-docs
will extract the contents of the comment, stripping all the
common leading whitespace from all lines, returning the following text that will
be passed to our CommonMark parser:
foo
bar
baz
Similar to Dhall multi-line string literals, the -}
position also affects the
final indentation, meaning that in the following sample:
{-|
foo
bar
-}
The following text will be extracted:
foo
bar
Only spaces and tabs are taken into account in calculating the longest common whitespace prefix. Other forms of whitespaces are not considered.
Empty lines are ignored when determining the indentation level but are preserved on the extracted text. On the following example:
{-|
foo
bar
-}
dhall-docs
will extract the following text:
foo
bar
Note that a line that only contains trailing whitespace will be taken into
account when calculating the common indentation. The line between foo
and bar
on the following example has leading whitespace (two (2) whitespaces):
␣␣{-|
␣␣␣␣foo
␣␣
␣␣␣␣bar -}
meaning that the extracted text will be:
foo
bar
If there is no newline between the opening brace of a dhall-docs
block comment
(i.e. {-|
), that comment will be considered invalid: dhall-docs
will not
render it on the documentation and a warning will be logged on the console:
{-| foo
bar -}
... although it's a valid Dhall block comment, it's invalid for dhall-docs
.
To end, if the |
character isn't immediately after the opening brace,
dhall-docs
will ignore the comment without logging on the console. This lets
you separate your internal block comments from the ones that you want
dhall-docs
to output in the final markup.
This is an example of a file documented using block comments:
{-|
# My awesome package
This is the header of my package
* a list item in **bold**
- a sub item in _italic_
- a [link](https://example.com)
* a `code` quote
A new paragraph
an indented code block
-}
let myAwesomeFunction {- this will be ignored on the documentation -}
= \(x : Natural) -> x + 1
in
{
{-|
foo
bar
baz
-}
myAwesomeFunction
}
Normal Dhall single-line comments start with --
and ends at a newline. For
example:
-- single-line comment
0
A dhall-docs
valid single-line comment starts with --|
and a single whitespace
character. For example:
--|␣foo
You can span your documentation in several single-line comments by writing --
and two
(2) whitespaces:
--|␣foo
--␣␣bar
--␣␣␣␣␣␣baz
The --
prefix defines the base indentation for any line. That is, on the above
example dhall-docs
will extract the following contents:
foo
bar
␣␣␣␣baz
If you would like to force an empty line on the documentation output, place an empty single line comment. On this example:
--| foo
--
-- bar
dhall-docs
will extract:
foo
bar
The empty --
line should not have the two (2) whitespaces.
If between two single-line comments there is one (1) or more empty lines, the latter comments will be ignored. On this example:
--| foo
-- bar
-- baz
dhall-docs
will only capture this text:
foo
bar
In a set of subsequent single-line comments, all lines before the one that has
the |
character will be ignored, meaning that if any line on the set doesn't
have the |
marker, no text will be extracted for the generated documentation.
On this example:
-- foo
-- bar
--| baz
-- qux
the following text will be extracted:
baz
qux
and this set of single-line comments:
-- foo
-- bar
-- baz
will be ignored by the tool.
The set of --
lines needs to be aligned with the same number of preceding
characters, meaning that a set of lines like this:
--| foo
-- bar
-- baz
is invalid: dhall-docs
will ignore this on the generated documentation and
a warning will be logged on the console.
To end, if there are language tokens in-between a set of lines, the lines after those tokens will be ignored. On this example:
--| foo
,
-- bar
the extracted text will be the following:
foo
Here is an example of using this type of comments in a Dhall file:
--| # My header
--
-- * 1
-- * 2
let --| foo
-- bar
a = True
in { a }
In a single Dhall file, you can use any type of comments to document your code, but there is a restriction.
Two subsequent dhall-docs
comments (whether single-line or
block comments) are forbidden: dhall-docs
will reject them and log a warning
on the console, but you can freely place any non-dhall comment after a dhall-docs
comment. All of the following examples are invalid:
{-|
foo -}
{-|
bar -}
{-|
foo -}
--| bar
{-|
foo -}
{- -}
{-|
qux -}
--| foo
-- bar
{-|
qux -}
--| foo
-- bar
{- -}
--| qux
-- baz
Note that non dhall-docs
comments are ignored in the above examples.
After extracting the text on a valid dhall-docs
comment, it will be passed
to mmark
. If there is a CommonMark parse error, an error will be logged
on the console but the extracted text will be rendered in the documentation exactly as it was extracted.
A limitation of the dhall
parser is that it doesn't preserve all the whitespaces
of a Dhall source file, but preserves the enough to write useful documentation.
dhall-docs
supports the following comments:
-
The header of a file:
{-| this is the header -} let a = 1 in a
If you want to open the ghci
repl on this package using stack
, you have to
provide an additional flag:
stack ghci dhall-docs --flag dhall-docs:ghci-data-files
... otherwise the CSS and JS files won't be properly embedded
We have a golden-test setup to test the whole tool. If you add a new test file or introduced a change that changed the way the documentation is generated, do the following:
- On
tasty/Main.hs
search for the usages ofSilver.defaultMain
and replace them withTest.Tasty.defaultMain
- Execute the test runner with the
--accept
flag. In stack you could do:stack test dhall-docs:tasty --test-arguments --accept
- After updating the golden files, revert the change on (1)
Our hydra job sets builds documentation for the following test packages:
If you're in a PR, you can see the generated documentation by navigating to:
https://hydra.dhall-lang.org/job/dhall-haskell/${PR_NUMBER}/${PACKAGE_NAME}/latest/download/1/docs
... where ${PACKAGE_NAME}
is one of the following:
prelude-dhall-docs
if you want to see Dhall's Prelude documentationkubernetes-dhall-docs
if you want to see thedhall-kubernetes
documentation packagetest-dhall-docs
if you want to see the test demo package
If you want to see the latest generated docs on the master
branch, visit:
https://hydra.dhall-lang.org/job/dhall-haskell/master/${PACKAGE_NAME}/latest/download/1/docs