Add new operating status options to field_operating_status_facility

[Agile6MSkinner]

Description

New options that we will provide editors for their facilities' operating status will need to be added to the values in field_operating_status_facility

New Values Are: NOT FINAL

• Coming Soon
• Relocating

This ticket can't ship until we have updated the form in #19807

Engineering notes / background

The form display UX for showing or hiding the "More information" textarea is addressed in va_gov_facilities/js/facility_status_details.es6.js. Because it uses "normal" or NOT "normal" as the condition, it should only need to be tested and does not require a code change.

Testing & QA

QA Test plan in ticket #19808

• Need to check the form UX to confirm that all statuses that are not "Normal" require a "More information" field to show.

Scope / Impact analysis

What, if anything, could break as a result of this change?
Engineer should assess this when approaching PR.

Roles / assignments

After functional testing, code review, accessibility review, and design review can happen in parallel.

• Functional testing:
• Code review:
• Design review:
• Accessibility review:
• Product acceptance:

Acceptance criteria

• New options added to this field display on the relevant content types
  • nca_facility
  • health_care_local_facility
  • vba_facility
  • vet_center
  • vet_center_cap
  • vet_center_outstation
  • IEF on vamc_operating_status_and_alerts
• All statuses that are not "Normal" require "More information" field to show (label= "Details")
  • Required
  • 300 character limit, with character counter displayed
• Does this product have an existing regression test plan?
  • Yes, link:
  • No, regression test plan will be created as part of the work / points in this ticket

[davidmpickett]

@Agile6MSkinner @omahane I updated the ACs to include an explicit list of the Content Types that this field displays on. One of them that I almost forgot about is the IEF on the VAMC System Operating Status page. There's a backlog ticket to remove that IEF, but while it's still alive we should make sure it's accounted for.