-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 70
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[SPIKE] CMS Collab Cycle - Discovery for QA #18110
Comments
Note to self: get this ticket refined and have it mirroring the collab cycle accessibility review: #17442 |
Due date: have completed by DC offsite trip in June |
@gracekretschmer-metrostar Can you give this page a read when you have time? These are my findings and suggestions for a first pass with CMS QA in the collab cycle. |
Next steps:
|
Next steps:
|
Thanks, Jon! I am going to get the Governance Team's review represented in a new ticket and I consider this closed. Great work! |
User Story or Problem Statement
Determine if/how CMS can leverage the existing collab cycle for QA standards and where the CMS team wants to add their own QA standards into the process.
Steps for Implementation
Acceptance Criteria
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: