#6 chown 07 conflicts with chown 05

[denismo]

This is to do with permitPrivilegedOnly. On one hand, one test executes chown under unprivileged user without changing ownership but expects EPERM. On the other hand, other test expects not to get EPERM is ownership does not change

[denismo]

The current behavior seems to be the most stable as it does not cause other tests to fail:

    def permitPrivilegedOnly(self, block, uid, gid):
        (ouid, unused, unused) = fuse_get_context()
        if ouid and not (uid == -1 or uid == block['st_uid']):
            self.log.debug('permitPrivilegedOnly: owner is not privileged %d => %d, owner %d', block['st_uid'], uid, ouid)
            raise FuseOSError(EPERM)

[denismo]

In case of an error, the values are like this:
ouid - 65533
uid - 65534
st_uid - 65534