We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi, I've noticed some discrepancies in the delly.vcf output file and what is displayed in IGV.
I've loaded .bam and .vcf to IGV. When I scroll to see the variants I see such picture:
so basically I see BND variant under the postion: chr1:3074907-3074907
however as you see on the picture, there are no reads. I checked in command line too: samtools view sample.bam 1:3074900-3074907 (no output)
samtools view sample.bam 1:3074900-3074907
When I grep the variant in the .vcf file (this is file obtained with: delly/scripts/delly2bnd.py)
1 208267466 BND00008607_1st C ]4:3074906]C 556 PASS PRECISE;SVTYPE=BND;SVMETHOD=EMBL.DELLYv1.2.6;END=208267467;CHR2=4;POS2=3074906;PE=0;MAPQ=0;CT=5to3;CIPOS=-30,30;CIEND=-30,30;SRMAPQ=60;INSLEN=0;HOMLEN=29;SR=14;SRQ=0.962963;CONSENSUS=AGATTACTTTCCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCGATGTAATTGACCCCCATTTACAGATGATGCAGCTTTAA;CE=1.95813;CONSBP=41;RDRATIO=1;AC=1;AN=2;MATEID=BND00008607_2nd GT:GL:GQ:FT:RCL:RC:RCR:RDCN:DR:DV:RR:RV 0/1:-190.279,0,-165.834:10000:PASS:34793:95869:61076:2:0:0:56:67
4 3074906 BND00008607_2nd G G[1:208267466[ 556 PASS PRECISE;SVTYPE=BND;SVMETHOD=EMBL.DELLYv1.2.6;END=3074907;CHR2=1;POS2=208267466;PE=0;MAPQ=0;CT=3to5;CIPOS=-30,30;CIEND=-30,30;SRMAPQ=60;INSLEN=0;HOMLEN=29;SR=14;SRQ=0.962963;CONSENSUS=AGATTACTTTCCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCGATGTAATTGACCCCCATTTACAGATGATGCAGCTTTAA;CE=1.95813;CONSBP=41;RDRATIO=1;AC=1;AN=2;MATEID=BND00008607_1st GT:GL:GQ:FT:RCL:RC:RCR:RDCN:DR:DV:RR:RV 0/1:-190.279,0,-165.834:10000:PASS:34793:95869:61076:2:0:0:56:67
So there is a BND pair in vcf file: 1 208267466 BND00008607_1st 4 3074906 BND00008607_2nd
But IGV shows on the position 1:3074906 variant that should be actually 4:3074906 (and it is there too)
What kind of issue it might be?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
So the delly VCF is correct or is there a bug in the converter script delly2bnd.py?
delly2bnd.py
Sorry, something went wrong.
tobiasrausch
No branches or pull requests
Hi, I've noticed some discrepancies in the delly.vcf output file and what is displayed in IGV.
I've loaded .bam and .vcf to IGV. When I scroll to see the variants I see such picture:
so basically I see BND variant under the postion:
chr1:3074907-3074907
however as you see on the picture, there are no reads. I checked in command line too:
samtools view sample.bam 1:3074900-3074907
(no output)
When I grep the variant in the .vcf file (this is file obtained with: delly/scripts/delly2bnd.py)
1 208267466 BND00008607_1st C ]4:3074906]C 556 PASS PRECISE;SVTYPE=BND;SVMETHOD=EMBL.DELLYv1.2.6;END=208267467;CHR2=4;POS2=3074906;PE=0;MAPQ=0;CT=5to3;CIPOS=-30,30;CIEND=-30,30;SRMAPQ=60;INSLEN=0;HOMLEN=29;SR=14;SRQ=0.962963;CONSENSUS=AGATTACTTTCCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCGATGTAATTGACCCCCATTTACAGATGATGCAGCTTTAA;CE=1.95813;CONSBP=41;RDRATIO=1;AC=1;AN=2;MATEID=BND00008607_2nd GT:GL:GQ:FT:RCL:RC:RCR:RDCN:DR:DV:RR:RV 0/1:-190.279,0,-165.834:10000:PASS:34793:95869:61076:2:0:0:56:67
4 3074906 BND00008607_2nd G G[1:208267466[ 556 PASS PRECISE;SVTYPE=BND;SVMETHOD=EMBL.DELLYv1.2.6;END=3074907;CHR2=1;POS2=208267466;PE=0;MAPQ=0;CT=3to5;CIPOS=-30,30;CIEND=-30,30;SRMAPQ=60;INSLEN=0;HOMLEN=29;SR=14;SRQ=0.962963;CONSENSUS=AGATTACTTTCCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCAGCGATGTAATTGACCCCCATTTACAGATGATGCAGCTTTAA;CE=1.95813;CONSBP=41;RDRATIO=1;AC=1;AN=2;MATEID=BND00008607_1st GT:GL:GQ:FT:RCL:RC:RCR:RDCN:DR:DV:RR:RV 0/1:-190.279,0,-165.834:10000:PASS:34793:95869:61076:2:0:0:56:67
So there is a BND pair in vcf file:
1 208267466 BND00008607_1st
4 3074906 BND00008607_2nd
But IGV shows on the position 1:3074906 variant that should be actually 4:3074906 (and it is there too)
What kind of issue it might be?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: