Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUG]: Operator e2e scenario for powerscale driver with second set of alternate values is failing in OpenShift cluster #1600

Closed
gilltaran opened this issue Nov 20, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
area/csm-operator type/bug Something isn't working. This is the default label associated with a bug issue.
Milestone

Comments

@gilltaran
Copy link

Bug Description

In OCP clusters, the master nodes have the taint - key: "node-role.kubernetes.io/master" and not - key: "node-role.kubernetes.io/control-plane" so the controller pods are looking for a taint that doesn't exist in the E2E test scenarios that uses existing alternate values file. The toleration - key: "node-role.kubernetes.io/master" should be added.

Logs

In OCP clusters, the master nodes have the taint - key: "node-role.kubernetes.io/master" and not - key: "node-role.kubernetes.io/control-plane" so the controller pods are looking for a taint that doesn't exist in the E2E test scenarios that uses existing alternate values file. The toleration - key: "node-role.kubernetes.io/master" should be added.

Screenshots

No response

Additional Environment Information

No response

Steps to Reproduce

Execute the specified e2e scenario in OpenShift cluster

Expected Behavior

Controller pods should be successfully scheduled in Openshift cluster

CSM Driver(s)

CSI-Powerscale

Installation Type

No response

Container Storage Modules Enabled

No response

Container Orchestrator

OpenShift Server Version: 4.17

Operating System

RHCOS

@gilltaran gilltaran added needs-triage Issue requires triage. type/bug Something isn't working. This is the default label associated with a bug issue. labels Nov 20, 2024
@csmbot
Copy link
Collaborator

csmbot commented Nov 20, 2024

@gilltaran: Thank you for submitting this issue!

The issue is currently awaiting triage. Please make sure you have given us as much context as possible.

If the maintainers determine this is a relevant issue, they will remove the needs-triage label and respond appropriately.


We want your feedback! If you have any questions or suggestions regarding our contributing process/workflow, please reach out to us at [email protected].

@gilltaran
Copy link
Author

gilltaran commented Nov 20, 2024

link: 30361

@dell dell deleted a comment from prablr79 Nov 20, 2024
@gilltaran gilltaran removed the needs-triage Issue requires triage. label Nov 20, 2024
@gilltaran gilltaran self-assigned this Nov 20, 2024
@gilltaran gilltaran added this to the v1.13.0 milestone Nov 20, 2024
@gilltaran
Copy link
Author

Bug associated with it is resolved and closed hence closing the issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/csm-operator type/bug Something isn't working. This is the default label associated with a bug issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants