Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issues faced using Energy2d function #301

Open
GSINGH006 opened this issue Dec 16, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Issues faced using Energy2d function #301

GSINGH006 opened this issue Dec 16, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@GSINGH006
Copy link

Hi ,@clonker while using deeptime.util.energy2d for plotting 2d energy landscape i faced some issues .I am backbone_torsions(cossin=True) as feature and when i am generating energy landscape with x-axis as TIC1 and y axis as TIC2 I am generating it by using tica lag time=400 ps But when i use lag time=800 ps the plot completely shifts like its an mirror image of earlier plot(400 ps).I am not able to understand this behaviour ?

@clonker
Copy link
Member

clonker commented Dec 16, 2024

It is very hard to say what is going wrong without seeing the actual plot. Keep in mind, though, that by changing the lagtime, you are also changing the operator you are approximating. It might very well be, that the processes found under 800ps are different onces compared to 400ps. I recommend looking at the implied timescales and seeing whether there is a separation of scales.

@GSINGH006
Copy link
Author

GSINGH006 commented Dec 17, 2024

@clonker here are the Implied timescale plot and timescale separation plot when 800 ps was taken as msm lag time there is time scale separation
TICA80
its40
Screenshot from 2024-12-17 12-59-17
Screenshot from 2024-12-17 12-58-59

@GSINGH006
Copy link
Author

hi @clonker i still couldn't figure out the reason behind shifting of plots.I have attached the pictures of the free energy landscape for 400 ps and 1000 ps lag time
BT_CS_400
BT_CS_1000

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants