Does the VcJwtiss require a did fragment?

[nitro-neal]

should the iss claim for a vcjwt be:

did:jwk:eyJrdHkiOiJPS1AiLCJjcnYiOiJFZDI1NTE5IiwieCI6InJBOWFDNTllVzJNQm1kM0VFVW9od2lGRmxqNmJMYUs5WlBQc0pGU1hqTjAifQ

OR

did:jwk:eyJrdHkiOiJPS1AiLCJjcnYiOiJFZDI1NTE5IiwieCI6InJBOWFDNTllVzJNQm1kM0VFVW9od2lGRmxqNmJMYUs5WlBQc0pGU1hqTjAifQ#eyJrdHkiOiJPS1AiLCJjcnYiOiJFZDI1NTE5IiwieCI6InJBOWFDNTllVzJNQm1kM0VFVW9od2lGRmxqNmJMYUs5WlBQc0pGU1hqTjAifQ

[decentralgabe]

iss should not have a DID fragment, the kid should be a DID fragment. I will update the spec to clarify this.

[decentralgabe]

@nitro-neal is this clear in the spec today? do we have test vectors that check this? can this be closed?